Note Well:
This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mischaracterizing these expressed intentions.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Stalking horse — par excellence

"Make no mistake …; f*ck 'em if they can't take a joke!"
— The Donald


(Image via FoxNews.com)
Related source » Donald Trump Drops F-Bombs, Calls Leaders 'Stupid' in Vegas Stop
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“In the meantime we can't get a f---ing school in Brooklyn. […] We have nobody in Washington that sits back and said, you're not going to raise that f---ing price. […] Listen you mother f---ers, we're going to tax you 25 percent. […] Our leaders are stupid, they are stupid people. […] There is a really good chance that I won't win because of one of these blood-sucking politicians.” [emphasis added]
— Published April 29, 2011 | FoxNews.com


There is much to ridicule about The Donald, not the least of which is his hair "style". But there is one overriding factor in his favor — he's on America's side.

Is he politically correct? Not even close. On the downside, however, he is probably unelectable because of it. But would I vote for a guy like this, given his likely opponent in a national election? You betcha; in a heart beat.

I would vote for The Yellow Horse [an old joke] over The Obama [another joke]. At least the Yellow-Horse joke is funny.

Post 1,621 Stalking horse — par excellence

30,000 Visits Milestone

The 30,000th visit to "Remembrance in Spacetime" was registered this morning, Apr 29 2011, at 10:09:14 am. My first post, "... Justice for all", was published on April 16, 2007.

Herewith some statistics to mark the occasion:

Page-view Distribution by Countries
(116 countries / 4,127 cities)

Post 1,620

30,000 Visits Milestone

Thursday, April 28, 2011

The Forlorn Hope

The ignorant shall inherit the debt. But pitied are to be the defenseless: for they shall be collateral damage.


THE GREATEST FRAUD AND  CHARLATAN OF THE YOUR ...Image by SS&SS via Flickr
Related source » The Birth Certificate
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“Trump is expendable, and quite logically provided the service of being the Forlorn Hope, that sacrificial body of men who, in the Napoleonic Era, led the first suicidal charge against enemy walls. Obama has trumped the least dangerous gambler at the table — Donald Trump. But the rest are unlikely to be dismayed. For one thing, critics will note that Obama didn’t pass around the card. He merely passed around a photocopy of its contents. Why shouldn’t this be enough? Because the restriction of the source data to Onaka or a small group of people opens him to the “Nazi on the Moon Problem.” That is when you claim a thing to be true based on evidence that you alone or your close associates can actually see. […] But the underlying problem is the outrageousness of the proposition of a Nazi plot. Some people find it incomprehensible that a politician they loathe as much as Barack Obama could be born in the USA. Therefore they are convinced that he is a fake. Obama’s ultimate exit from this problem is not more documentary evidence but to convince voters by his demeanor that he “acts American.” Once that is established, the issue will vanish.” [emphasis added]
— Richard Fernandez, April 27th, 2011 (pajamasmedia.com)



It is true. The Obama is loathable (i.e., capable of being loathed). His tenure of the Presidency has been the most destructive of the American way of life, ever. And He isn't finished yet.

But not all is as hopeless as He promised. The destruction is not uniformly distributed. It affects disproportionately those least able to sustain the damage — the ignorant and, unfortunately, the defenseless. As the former are most deserving, the latter are least so, for they are the inevitable collateral damage of any ignorance-caused calamity. C'est la guerre.

For those who properly see Him as He truly is, we can take whatever precautions are appropriate and available. First and foremost among them is recognition that ignorance is not bliss. Having acknowledged that His policies are designed to bring about a failed European lifestyle, which our Founders explicitly rejected in 1776, we hunker down for the inevitable downsizing of our liberty, economy, and civility, preparing for the long recovery after the menace has been trashed into the dustbin of our self-imposed misfortune.

Whether or not we, the survivors, succeed in a hoped-for recovery for the Nation as a whole, we will at least assure ourselves of avoiding the fate of the Forlorn Hope. May God bless America.

Post 1,619 The Forlorn Hope

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Stunning Virtuosity!

Related source » Danny MacAskill - "Way Back Home"
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“Way Back Home is the incredible new riding clip from Danny MacAskill, it follows him on a journey from Edinburgh back to his hometown Dunvegan, in the Isle of Skye.”
— Uploaded by redbull on Nov 16, 2010





Post 1,618 Stunning Virtuosity!

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Rules to Live By — Updated

Moses with the tablets of the Ten Commandments...Image via Wikipedia
God asked Moses, "Do you want a commandment?"
And Moses replied, "How much?"
God said, "It's free."
Moses: "I'll take 10."
[The rest of this joke is history.]
Related source » Judging People
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“I see a lot of judging going around lately. And I notice that people often invent their own standards of right and wrong just before passing sentence. What this world needs is some sort of universal standard so we'd always know for sure who is good and who is bad. The Ten Commandments was a start. That list covers some of the basics. But it's a bit dated, and it doesn't cover the important questions of our day, such as who is arrogant, who doesn't work hard enough, who should come out of the closet, who is a hypocrite, who is an Internet troll, and so on. Society is inventing new ways of being bad more quickly than we can evolve the rules to cover the new situations. We need some sort of standard that can keep up. I'm unqualified for the task of creating this new standard of good and bad because I believe free will is an illusion. By my view, we're born, our molecules bump around then we die. No one is good or bad if we're all just bumping around according to physical laws. Any standard for good and bad behavior that I suggest would be inconsistent with my own point of view. But for some reason I'm going to suggest just such a standard anyway. Apparently I can't help myself. And my standard goes like this: You're a good person if you work hard at something that is useful to society and you try to avoid hurting other people when it's practical.”
— Scott Adams, Apr 26, 2011 (dilbert.com)



I like Scott's version of an updated set of rules to live by. But since I am inclined to believe we do have free will (or what amounts to the same thing: our predestination involves such a colossal set of parameters that our behavior is indistinguishable from free will), I will venture a set of guidelines, too. To wit:

TheBigHenry's Dos and Don'ts
(or else, You're Out of the Gene Pool!)
  1. Don't do to others what you wouldn't want done to you. This Golden Rule (GR) needs no further elaboration.
  2. Try not to be a schmuck. If this sounds too vague for you, then try not to be like Chuck Schumer, aka Schmuck Chewer.
  3. Mind your own business (MYOB). Got too much time on your hands? Read a book. Write a blog. Go back to school. Get a job. Volunteer. Exercise. But stay out of my space. If I think you may be on to something, I'll call you.
  4. Honor your mother and father. They gave you life; you owe them that. You may not like them. You undoubtedly think Johnny's parents gave better Christmas presents. You probably think they mistreated you or didn't give you everything you were entitled to. Nevertheless, they gave you life, and unless they take it away from you, you have to at least acknowledge that fact on occasion, and act accordingly.
  5. Don't be a murdering son of a bitch (specific instance of GR).
  6. Don't steal. But if you're like Jean Valjean, taking a loaf of bread that you haven't paid for can be overlooked, if you are really hungry.
  7. My work is done, and it is good. Some suggested amendments may be entertained, at my own discretion.

Post 1,617 Rules to Live By — Updated

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Schrödinger's Birth Certificate

SchrodingerscatImage via Wikipedia

⇦ Got birth certificate?

Related source » Schrödinger's cat
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment, usually described as a paradox, devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935. It illustrates what he saw as the problem of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics applied to everyday objects. The thought experiment presents a cat that might be alive or dead, depending on an earlier random event.”
— Wikipedia, modified 22 April 2011 (wikipedia.org)



Once upon a time, in the 1930s, the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger won the Nobel Prize in Physics for his eponymous equation of quantum mechanics. He needed a passport to attend the Nobel-Prize Ceremony in Stockholm, Sweden.

When he applied for his passport, he was informed that his birth certificate was required as a prerequisite for the documentation process, but, as he explained to the authorities, he could not proffer it because it could cause his cat's demise. The passport authorities were dumbfounded, but intrigued, so they asked him to explain.

Schrödinger's famous response went as follows [roughly translated from the Austrian original]:
“For safe-keeping, I placed my birth certificate in a compartment of the sealed box, shielded against environmentally induced quantum decoherence, where I have placed my beloved cat, along with a flask containing a poison and a radioactive source. If an internal Geiger counter detects radiation, the flask is shattered, releasing the poison that kills the cat. The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics implies that after a while, the cat is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when we look in the box, we see the cat either alive or dead, not both alive and dead. So I am loath to open the box, thereby risking the life of my cat, Hermann.”
The authorities didn't know if Erwin was full of it or the most brilliant man in the solar system, because none of them understood quantum mechanics, which is arguably more counter-intuitive than Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.

After a hurried consultation with the Passport Gruppenführer, Schrödinger was granted his passport on his own recognizance (and a hefty bribe to be paid from his Nobel windfall).

Subsequently, upon his return from Stockholm there was a great hue and cry about the underhanded manner in which the "passport issue" was handled. Many conspiracy theories were floated about his cat. People simply wouldn't buy that business about quantum weirdness. Something was rotten in Austria, fer shur. The people on both sides of the issue debated ad nauseam why Schrödinger wouldn't simply show his birth certificate and settle the issue.

Well, boys and girls, now it can finally be revealed. Whereas Schrödinger could have easily proven that he had a bona fide birth certificate, no one could prove that he didn't have one, because, as everyone already knows from various crime dramas on TV, you simply can't prove a negative. The only thing that was common to all the theories and counter-theories was the underlying assumption that Slick Erwin had some reason for not wanting his birth certificate to see the light of day.

Now, after exhaustive research and analysis, I have concluded that the only logical explanation, one that easily explains any and all questions about this vexing controversy is: the premise itself is false. Regardless of the life or death of Hermann the Cat, there never was a birth certificate.

Post 1,616 Schrödinger's Birth Certificate

This Week's Best of Rule 5

Image via Theo Spark
Post 1,615 This Week's Best of Rule 5

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Stop with the Keying!

President Barack Obama listens as Vice Preside...The Keys to Our Everlasting Torment
(Image via Wikipedia)

It's keying me off …

Related source » Obama: Gas Price Solution Lies in Renewable Energy Sources
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama says one answer to high gasoline prices is to spend money developing renewable energy sources.
"That's the key to helping families at the pump and reducing our dependence on foreign oil" in the long term, he said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet address. Obama raises the issue of rising fuel prices during almost every public appearance and says that he understands the strain higher fuel costs are putting on some family budgets. He announced Thursday during an event in Reno, Nev., that the Justice Department will begin looking for cases of fraud or manipulation in the oil markets, even though Attorney General Eric Holder suggested a variety of legal reasons may be behind the surging gas prices.” [emphasis added]
— Published April 23, 2011 | Associated Press (foxnews.com)



Whoever established the "key" meme should be given the key to hell. The Obama, Master of Platitudes and Inanities, and His key lackeys are making me nauseous. Why don't they just sit on the biggest keys they can find, and rotate!

"That's the key to helping families at the pump and reducing our dependence on foreign oil". No shit, Sherlock. I think we've all heard that before.

I can't stand listening to this pablum. Why don't you just put some of those solar panels where the sun don't shine, you morons.

    A Few More Keys That Need to Be Locked the Feck Up
  • "That's right, Boomer. The key to winning this football game is defense."
  • "That's right, Ace. The key to this series is pitching. Some ribbies wouldn't hurt either."
  • "Right you are, Skipper. The key for State is if their new point-guard can dribble."
  • "The key to this primary is getting out the vote, especially the out-of-staters."
  • "The key to this election is the independent vote."
  • "The key to successful investing is selling high and buying low."
  • "The key to economics is supply and demand."
There's a million of these. Just STFU, already.

Post 1,614 Stop with the Keying!

Friday, April 22, 2011

Life in the Age of Pessimism

The equestrian sculpture of George Washington ...Image via Wikipedia

The heroism of George Washington has long expired. The tsunami of Big-government Washington is gaining on us. It won't be pretty   …



The way I see it, it's all over but the shouting. The shouting is just getting started. But none of it will matter when the big-government tsunami that is bearing down on us sweeps away our American traditions of self-reliance, individual accountability, and cooperative efforts for the good of the Nation. That proverbial fat-lady has already sung the first stanza of our American requiem.

As George Washington and his Founding Brothers ushered in the great socio-political and economic experiment in republican government, the inexorable forces of individual human failings began chipping away at its miraculous foundations. And though 100-year heroic interventions by the likes of Abraham Lincoln in national leadership and Albert Einstein in scientific innovation have extended the age of optimism that followed, the unbounded growth of the federal government has stormed beyond the point of no-return.

It is no longer conceivable to me that we can muster sufficient national will to reign in the beast. Where once it was possible to reach a modicum of consensus on issues of national importance, such as defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, we are now trapped in a cacophony of babble emanating from hundreds of millions of voices and resonating in the grand echo-chamber of the internet. Yes, I admit to my 2-cents worth.

The great issues of our time will resolve themselves. But I doubt very much the resolution will resemble a coherent plan. With the kinds of weasels who currently slither into positions of power, the kind that would throw their grandmother under the bus sooner than listen to her old-wives tales, nothing of creative substance can be accomplished anymore. The best we can hope for is that the inevitable downsizing of our standard of living will settle above the level of survival.

Post 1,613 Life in the Age of Pessimism

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Strike While the Irony's Hot

Master Pundit (or Baiter?)      (Image via Theo)
“When you elect a president, you ought to elect a man who knows where he's going and knows how to get there. And if you don't do that, you get what's coming to you.”
— President Harry S Truman
Related source » The Irony of Keynes
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]
“[B]ut to me the struggle at the root of all those is an economic one: Supply Side Economics (SSE) vs. Demand Side Economics (DSE). […] A further source of confusion enters in when economists let their unrevealed political bias color their explanations. Not being an economist, but as someone who has studied this stuff on my own gives me a perspective that might help others get to the essence behind SSE and DSE. […] Supply Side Economics is the theory that individuals un-hindered by government forced wealth re-distribution will choose to be productive and increase the “Supply” of labor and capital producing more “Supply” of goods and services, which will stimulate economic activity and maximize prosperity. Conversely, Demand Side Economics is the theory that government forced wealth re-distribution will spread purchasing power to more people and increase the overall “Demand” for goods and services producing more “Demand” for labor and capital which will stimulate economic activity and maximize prosperity. […] DSE or “Keynesian Theory” when associated with John Maynard Keynes usually refers to targeted re-distribution exemplified by short-term “stimulus” designed to minimize a dip in the “business cycle”. Cash for Clunkers, the 787 Billion Dollar Stimulus Bill, and TARP are recent examples of the original intent of DSE re-distribution. But that is a small part of total DSE. Most wealth re-distribution is done to achieve political or social goals and not for specific economic benefit. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare are all re-distributive programs and are social and political programs first and foremost. […] So, what is the difference between wealth re-distribution and “normal” government spending? I would maintain that any fiscal expenditure for a reason other than the essential roles of government is a form of wealth re-distribution. Neither SSE nor DSE questions the need for essential government services, or the idea that taxes must be collected in order to fund them. But of course, the devil is in the details and in this case the detail is how a society defines the “essential roles of government”. In our case we can start with the US Constitution and call anything in that document essential. Anything we have added above and beyond our constitution is, I would contend, wealth re-distribution. […] Again, there are often compelling socio/political reasons for a society to engage in wealth re-distribution. But what often is obscured is the economic damage and deceit involved in this choice. Unfortunately, the underlying premise of DSE is flawed as is the generational theft which accompanies it. […] Supply can satisfy Demand, but Demand can never satisfy Supply. Put another way, all the Demand in the world can never Supply food for the hungry unless there is a reason for producers to Supply food. Demand alone does no good. […] The theory is that Demand alone will stimulate producers to Supply more. But the flaw in that thinking is that the re-distribution of wealth works exactly in the opposite direction in two ways: first, by taking money from producers it reduces the reward for them to create Supply, and second, it disincentivizes Demanders to contribute their labor. It’s a classic lose-lose scenario. […] The current course we are on is as close to a pure Demand Side Economic model as we are likely to ever see. That makes this a watershed moment in the debate over economic theory. Too bad for us we may end up, as the father of DSE John Maynard Keynes famously said, “slaves of some dead economist”. If that isn’t ironic enough for you, consider this; we are being led into this servitude by our First Black President.” [emphasis added]
— Ronny Reich, December 20, 2009 (ibdst.blogspot.com)


Like Mr. Reich, whose excellent article I have excerpted (above), I am not an economist, though I believe it is vital, for every American who votes, to be conversant with its basic principles. Despite having audited four courses in the past couple of years, taught by three tenured economics-professors at North Carolina State, I still get confused by political rhetoric on this, one of the most important subjects facing the electorate.

And it is small wonder that most of us are confused, because that is precisely what politicians are striving to do in furtherance of their political agendas. Recall that every politician aims to buy your vote by appealing to your own misunderstanding of the economic factors affecting you and future generations of Americans.

In essence, economics is a soft science (some have called it the dismal science). It is very much a work-in-progress and it is extremely difficult to extract neat guidelines that can be relied on to bring about the intended consequences for actions taken on a global scale.

But among those guidelines that have a better than average chance of working as intended is the concept of avoiding what has never worked in the past. This is another way of saying, "Don't be an idiot".

This time it is NOT different.

Post 1,612 Strike While the Irony's Hot

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Societal Disorder Registry: Political Correctness

No political correctnessImage via Wikipedia

Political correctness is one of the banes of society.

Related source » Bull About Bullying
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“When judges create new "rights" for bullies out of thin air, just as they do for criminals, and prescribe "due process" for school discipline, just as if schools were little courtrooms, then nothing is likely to happen promptly or decisively. […] President Barack Obama has joined the chorus of those deploring bullying. But his own administration is pushing the notion that a disproportionate number of suspensions or other punishments for members of particular racial or ethnic groups is discriminatory. In other words, if a school suspends more black males than Asian females, that is taken as a sign of discrimination. No one in his right mind really believes that, but it is part of the grand make-believe that pervades our politics and even our courts. […] If these were white kids beating up Hispanic kids, cries of outrage would ring out across the land from the media, the politicians, the churches and civic groups. But it is not politically correct to make a fuss when black kids beat up Asian kids.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2011/04/19 (townhall.com)



It is widely acknowledged that our great American society is, nevertheless, beset by issues in need of improvement. Among the most egregious of these has been self-imposed:
Political correctness […] is a term which denotes language, ideas, policies, and behavior seen as seeking to minimize social and institutional offense in occupational, gender, racial, cultural, sexual orientation, religious belief, disability, and age-related contexts, and doing so to an excessive extent. [emphasis added]
— From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As if we didn't have enough naturally emerging problems to deal with, the leftists among us insist on burdening all of us with this completely misguided monkey wrench. Moreover, the same leftists' conceit is that they themselves know intrinsically what is politically correct, and, equally menacing, what is not. This societal straightjacket from political hell has led to a plethora of behavioral madness of the sort described in Thomas Sowell's article (excerpted above).

The underlying fallacy of PC is the fantasy that government can successfully force uniformity of beliefs, attitudes and behavior so as to effect uniformity of outcomes conforming to established quotas that mimic all census demographics. Whereas our Nation's laws rightfully confer only equal opportunity to pursue happiness, our laws wisely do not guarantee equality of outcomes. And we are a nation of laws, not of men who think they are the law.

America is the land of opportunity. It is not, nor was it ever meant to be, the land of coercive PC. This is not to say we have no room for compassion. America has demonstrated great compassion for the less fortunate among us. But compassion must come from the hearts of men, not from the dictates of leftists. If you must ask, "why", I must respond, "because I say so", as do millions of other rational beings.

Post 1,611 Societal Disorder Registry: Political Correctness

Monday, April 18, 2011

Ignore Them in Plain Sight

You can't fight City Hall.


Image via nastynets.com
Related source » Descent of Africa Tests the Honesty of the Politically Correct
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“There was a great global rejoicing over the death of the apartheid regime of South Africa, and the coming of majority rule in 1994. Media analysts -- regardless of political persuasion -- were genuinely ecstatic over the rise of democratic self-governance in South Africa, and expected great things from Africa's richest nation, after apartheid. But something happened along the road to paradise for South Africa. Things got worse for everyone except the few corrupt insiders within the ANC. Crime, corruption, disease, poverty, human misery, all much worse -- and worsening with time, just as in Zimbabwe under Mugabe. But if you try to get a leftist's honest opinion about the ongoing descent of South Africa, you may find the going a bit rocky, to say the least. […] But the modern intellectual world has little tolerance for demonstrable, evidence-based theories, if they contradict politically correct dogma. And for at least that reason, one cannot truly hold an honest discussion about Africa with most leftists. Of course, many evidence-based theories contradict politically correct dogma, so Africa is not the only topic which is verboten, in terms of honest discussion. Anyone who wants to make his way to the higher levels of achievement in the politically correct world, must needs adjust his crap detector to its lowest possible setting, so as to be able to tolerate the PC crap which passes for common wisdom among most pseudo-intellectuals in academia, media, culture, and politics. Those of us who are unable to make such adjustments will just have to create something better on our own.”
— Al Fin, 18 APRIL 2011 (alfin2100.blogspot.com)


It's time for a change. I have come to accept that there is not enough energy, patience, and, especially, time for me to continue on my heretofore path to help restore some clarity of vision to our society. The situation is, for me at least, hopeless; it's all f*cked up. As the saying was when I was too young to understand it, "You can't fight City Hall", especially when you are well past your fighting-prime. I have come to realize there are better choices to be made by me for allocating whatever time is left for me to allocate.

Fighting the good fight is primarily for the energetic and idealistic young, who may be still too inexperienced to understand what is best for their own future, but who are sufficiently malleable to be persuaded by logic rather than propaganda. At least that is my hope.

When society has embarked on a suicidal spiral down toward ignorant superstition, wishful thinking, and a dog-eat-dog attitude toward all socio-political issues large and small, there are at least three alternative choices a relatively sane person can make: fight them; join them; or ignore them in plain sight. I now choose the latter.

I have tried fighting them with my brain, my life experiences, and my computer keyboard. It feels like banging your head against a brick wall, and it gives me a major migraine. I can not join them, unless it comes down to that or the gas chambers, in which case I might still choose cyanide. At this time, the only workable solution for me seems to be to ignore them, but try not to antagonize them in the process. Because the Joy Behars of the leftist moronicy are not only morons but also vindictive douchebags.

I will henceforth address (in my mind's eye) any serious or semi-serious posts to young people, who have not yet crossed over to that hopeless dark-side from which there is no return via rational means. Anyone can still stop by to read what I have written, of course. But, Joy Behar, you and your fellow leftist morons, know that I have nothing but contempt for you.

If there is any justice in this world (or the next), the leftists' fate awaits them in that special circle of hell where they force you to watch re-runs of Obama's "Greatest Hits". In perpetuity.

Post 1,610 Ignore Them in Plain Sight

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Fear and Self-Loathing in the United States

I fear the suicidal blindness of my people.


These are slave laborers in the Buchenwald con...Jewish slave laborers in Buchenwald (April 16, 1945).
(Image via Wikipedia)
Related source » Obama Outsourcin​g His Anti-Zioni​sm to The U.N.
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“By now it ought to be clear that Obama has joined the worldwide movement to turn the Jewish State into a Jewish concentration camp. Ironically, about the only people who still don’t get the picture are the Jews who voted in record numbers for Obama in 2008 and who are poised to do the same in 2012. Obama is still smarting from the unexpected political fallout that accompanied his overt insults to Israel’s PM in May of last year. Just think, it almost cost him Ed Koch and Elie Wiesel! From that experience, Obama learned he must be careful and keep his animus under control (or at the very least find new outlets for it) so as to keep his Jewish sheep at home quiet and avoid a needless “distraction” during his billion dollar quest for a second term. That’s where the U.N. comes in. Underreported or held in reverence by our media, it’s the perfect venue to reassure Obama’s comrades in the “international community” he’s still with them in the Israel-bashing game, and just as soon as he gets by the little formality of winning reelection, he will bear all his teeth, his gloves will come off and his brass knuckles will go on. If things go Obama’s way, they won’t have long to wait.”
— by Dan Friedman, 17 APRIL 2011 (theospark.net)



I have been saying this in these pages ever since it became abundantly clear to me during the presidential campaign of 2008. Apparently to little or no avail.

Obama is a Jew-hater. And the Jews who continue to ignore the obvious are self-loathing idiots.

There. I've said it. As unambiguously as I can.

Post 1,609 Fear and Self-Loathing in the United States

Saturday, April 16, 2011

This Week's Best of Rule 5

  
"***" by k_gena"Passion" by Anton Mislavsky

Post 1,608 This Week's Best of Rule 5

Thursday, April 14, 2011

POTUS boring; VEEP snoring; Nation hemorrhaging

Business As Usual: Socialists whoring; Unions devouring; Leftists roaring.


This is a big f*cking deal!”
(Image via blippitt.com)
Related source » President Boring
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“What is it about Barack Obama that caused his vice president Joe Biden to fall asleep during the president’s speech Tuesday? […] I submit it is something quite simple — he has nothing to say. He is a boring person, the quintessential “hollow man” in the T.S. Eliot sense. He is kind of a socialist, kind of a liberal, kind of a multi-culturalist, kind of an environmentalist, kind of globalist, kind of a budget cutter — but none of them with any real commitment. Basically, he’s a vague and uncommitted person pretending to be otherwise. He is the man that voted “present”, now in the presidency. The fact that he never specified the targets of “hope” and “change” during his election was far from a campaign ploy and more typical than we ever dreamed. There never was a there there. And now, I strongly suspect, there never will be.” [emphasis added]
— April 13, 2011, by Roger L Simon (pajamasmedia.com)



SNAFU: situation normal —all f*cked up. It was true during World War II. It is true today. It is hopey-dopey.

I know I've been beating a dead donkey, except that the donkey is very much alive. So the only thing to do is to keep beating it until it either destroys society or self destructs. Preferably the latter.

Our democratic society is such a glutton for punishment. It is like a poor woman, habitually abused by her overbearing idiot-husband, and unable to muster the will to end the abusive union. Elections come and go; political creatures ooze out of the woodwork with the same tired "promise them anything, but give them bullshit"; and the masochistic electorate continues to eat shit. And, worst of all, the shit-storm is usually greeted with the lament, "How did this happen?"

There is no mystery here. The Obamas of this world have been honing their tools-of-the-trade forever. And their strategy works almost every time. About once per century along comes a Washington or a Lincoln. That's it. The best and the brightest tend to keep a low profile, so as not to defile themselves in the public arena.

Do you blame them? It would take a near-saint to endure the self-absorbed hubris-driven enmity of our electorate. It may be trite, but we do, as a society, deserve the government we get.

Deal with it.

Post 1,607 POTUS boring; VEEP snoring; Nation hemorrhaging

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

The Weirding of Mentality

It's official: Society has gone bonkers!

Related source » The New Weathermen
Climatologists mount a terror campaign.
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“The game works like this. If the weather is warmer than usual, it is an infallible sign of global warming. If the weather is colder than usual, it is an equally infallible sign — owing to some ludicrous formula straight out of an alchemist’s notebook — that the climate is heating up alarmingly and we must all go green, pass cap and trade, drive Volts, turn down our thermostats, and set up phalanxes of unsightly, bird-shredding, budget-breaking, and neurosis-inducing windmills that may, on good days, produce enough electricity to power a 40-watt bulb. A massive snowfall climbing over the window ledge indicates the approach of desert-like winters when parents will recount nostalgic tales of snowball fights of yore to their wondering children. The predictions, though, need not always be counter-intuitive. A dry season means the baking inferno is nigh. A wet season signals the onset of Noahide floods, rising sea levels, and the submerging of Pacific islands. An ordinary day is merely the ominous quiet before the impending storm. It makes no difference what the data may be, they always point in the same direction.

Quite frankly, we have, most or at least many of us, gone stark raving mad. Experience counts for nothing. Theory is everything. One thinks of the old joke: It’s fine in practice, but will it work in theory? Only it’s not fine in practice, in defiance of which the theory must be patched together and upheld at all costs. […] ”
— April 12, 2011 - by David Solway (pajamasmedia.com)



The Peter Principle states that "in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence", meaning that employees tend to be promoted until they reach a position at which they cannot work competently. There is an analogous principle operating in our society, wherein the power brokers invoke a worldview that appeals to their irrational ideas for how the world ought to work, and proceed to propagandize their worldview until the majority among us are persuaded to do their bidding. Or else draw their condemnation.

The Obamas of this world conjure up some cockamamie policy without benefit of logic or reason, not to mention any contemplation of possible unintended consequences, and go boldly forth with it come hell or high water. Their arrogance is without limit because no matter what ultimately comes to pass, their personal welfare is shielded from harm by everyone else's misfortunes. In this regard, we are not much different from the murderous raving lunatics who take to the so-called Arab Street whenever their puppet masters tell them to.

It is difficult for those who cling to rational thought to know how to deal with such madness. I suppose that simply understanding that we have an almost insurmountable problem is a useful first step. For how can you hope to address a problem unless you first recognize that one exists. But I'll be damned if I know how to begin to approach a solution that would shield me and my loved ones from becoming mere cannon fodder for the brazen morons who hold the reins of power.

It's madness!

Post 1,606 The Weirding of Mentality

Monday, April 11, 2011

They didn't say it ...

   … but I wish they had!


Albert Einstein"It's all relative, dude."
(Image by mansionwb via Flickr)
Related source » Albert Einstein, Ecologist?
Gelf gets to the bottom of a dubious quote about bees attributed to the great physicist
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“Gelf can only speculate, but hitching your story, argument, or life's work to a cultural eminence such as Einstein has an undeniable appeal. Dr. Grosz tells Gelf that "there are numerous fake, twisted, and distortedly translated quotes out there attributed to Einstein. Unfortunately, the internet allows wrong information to proliferate at lightning speed without any control." (We'd like to add that the internet also makes it easier to correct such misinformation.) Still, we suspect that the likes of Einstein and other, similarly revered figures, will continue to be attached to supposed profundities that have little or nothing to do with them.”
— Vincent Valk, APRIL 25, 2007 (gelfmagazine.com) [h/t Newmark's Door]



They didn't say it ... but I wish they had!

Albert Einstein —
"It's all relative, dude."
God —
"I told you not to eat that apple, you moron!"
Noah —
"This must be Seattle."
Moses —
"Yeah, yeah, He saves. But I invest!"
Abraham —
"I have to cut off what?"
Tolstoy —
"You can't have one without the other."
Julius Caesar —
"Vidi; vici; veni."
Stupid Viking —
"Do we pillage before or after?"
Joseph Stalin —
"Next time, no more Mr. Nice Guy!"
Erwin Schrödinger —
"This cat is driving me nuts!"
Frank Sinatra —
"This doobie be some good shit!"
Wilt Chamberlain —
"Yeah, but whose counting?"
Rudyard Kipling
"A woman is only a woman; and a good cigar is a smoke. But Clinton's cigars have been there; that Willie's a mighty fine joke."
Macbeth —
"To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow, it's always the same — Jello!"
The Obama —
"Now let me be clear: If somebody doesn't cue this teleprompter immediately, that will be unacceptable!"
Nancy Pelosi —
"No, I don't know what's in the bill. Ask me if I care. Ask me if I can read."
There's a million of these.

Post 1,605 They didn't say it ...

Sunday, April 10, 2011

"Pocket Man"

  AKA "Jacket Man"



Women's accessories - Army hat
Image via J.Crew © 2011
Wifey recently bought herself this cool-looking hat from J. Crew (pictured). I was immediately intrigued by its neat, zippered side-pocket. How cool is that!

For as long as I can remember I have had a thing for outerwear, especially jackets. As a FRENCH CONNECTION ad has it: "Man and jacket need not talk. They have understanding." This is a rule that I live by. I have many jackets.

One of the things I love about jackets is all the pockets they are outfitted with. I spend a lot of time allocating every item I take with me, when I go out, to whichever jacket-pocket is best suited for it. If, for example, I happen to place my keys in the wrong pocket, I could be locked out of our home until wifey comes back.

Anyway, I'm a fanatic when it comes to compartmentalization. Everything has its proper place. Why else would God have invented pockets? So  when I saw wifey's new hat, I began fantasizing speculating about what a person might want to put in that zippered side-pocket.

You probably wouldn't want to put anything too valuable in there because you don't have to be a skilled pick-pocket to swipe someone's hat and run. So, possibly a few coins, or subway tokens (I'm a former New Yorker). Wifey said she might use it for a shopping list or a fortune (from a cookie). I suppose a smoker could stash an emergency cigarette there. If it's a man's hat, and the man happens to be a playa or a Tiger, he'd probably keep an opportunity condom in there.

Let me know if you come up with some good ideas. Every pocket must have its designated stuff.

Post 1,604 "Pocket Man"

This Week's Best of Rule 5

  
"Elena Tashlanova" by Jaroslav Cloos"Summer" by photomauler

Post 1,603 This Week's Best of Rule 5

Friday, April 8, 2011

Meta Posting

The Joy of Work by Scott AdamsImage via Wikipedia

Related source » I'm a What?
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“I write material for a specific sort of audience. […] Communication becomes distorted when you take it out of context, even if you don't change a word of the text. […] Regular readers of my blog know that the goal of my writing is to be interesting and nothing else. I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion, largely because I don't believe humans can be influenced by exposure to better arguments, even if I had some. But I do think people benefit by exposure to ideas that are different from whatever they are hearing, even when the ideas are worse. […] That approach springs from my observation that brains are like investment portfolios, where diversification is generally a good strategy. I'm not trying to move you to my point of view; I'm trying to add diversity to your portfolio of thoughts. In the short term, I hope it's stimulating enough to be entertaining. Long term, the best ideas probably come from people who have the broadest exposure to different views. Contrast my style of blogging to the most common styles, which include advocacy for some interest group or another, punditry, advice, and information. Now imagine moving my writing from the context of this blog to the context of an advocacy blog. You can see the problem. Men thought I was attacking men, and women thought I was attacking women. The message changed when the context changed. I saw that developing, so I took down the post.” [emphasis added]
— Scott Adams, Mar 27, 2011 (dilbert.com)



I shy away from meta posting; it's a matter of style. Occasionally, however, it suits my purpose to contradict myself. This, after all, is my blog, yes?

In the excerpted post (above), Scott Adams includes some general statements about his own blog-posting, which resonated with my own ideas about blogging. So I decided to (re)evaluate my modus operandi.

My blog is a venue for expressing myself, which along with reading, thinking and interacting socially with other people is an important activity of my waking hours. I enjoy it. It helps me organize my thoughts, cogitate about life, let off some steam, kid around. Did I mention it's fun? Now that I'm retired, having guilt-free fun is a high priority for me.

Frequently, I'll write about very serious issues. This is also fun, but the tone of such posts is more impassioned than my kidding around, as is my wont. Again, this is my blog; if it offends anyone, the EXIT signs here are well lit. I can only please so many people per day. This may very well be not your day. Even Tuesday might not work. How about never? Does never work for you? Oh, well.

Adams' point about "not trying to change anyone's opinion" is well taken. I have come to believe that is a hopeless and, therefore, a very frustrating goal, though I admit I once thought otherwise. People are work. You may quote me.

I see myself as a man who has accumulated a fair amount of life experiences and I believe I have learned many valuable lessons. I also believe I have acquired some knowledge that could be useful to others, and I am willing to share it. But I am very much aware that you can only lead a horse to water. And I really don't care enough to knock myself out in any attempt to persuade anyone to drink the water, with a very few select exceptions (and those only in private).

But, enough about me. How's your life going? Is that hopey-dopey workin' for ya?

Post 1,602 Meta Posting

Thursday, April 7, 2011

He's back in the saddle again ...

... Out where a friend is a friend

President Barack Obama, runs away from the fam...« BO and Obie (Image via Wikipedia)
“Ridin' the range once more
Totin' my old 44
Where you sleep out every night
And the only law is right
Back in the saddle again”
— Gene Autry
Related source » The Race Is On
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“WASHINGTON -- I see that President Barack Obama has filed as a candidate for reelection in 2012. I had suggested that he get to work early on his presidential library and forgo the race, but he is insistent. […] Well, the Democratic Party has been stuck with the chronic campaigner since 1972. […] Jimmy Carter ran the theretofore most grueling campaign in history and was lucky to have Gerald Ford as an opponent and Watergate. There was not a village too small for him to visit. If two people gathered on a street corner, the chances are Jimmy was there with his hand out and his idiot smile. The next chronic campaigner to win the presidency was Bill Clinton, and he is still campaigning for something. […] Obama has been running for president since his first day in the Senate. […] The problem with the chronic campaigner is that, though he is a swell candidate, he is a lousy chief executive. […] So our chronic campaigner [Obama] filed for reelection and left town for the campaign trail. [Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI)] offered a budget for 2012 and a vision. The race is on.”
— By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. on 4.7.11 (spectator.org)



There is bad news and a saving grace. The bad news is that our chronic campaigner is, nevertheless, a Champion among campaigners. The saving grace is that He will be out of the White House, both physically and in spirit, for the duration.

As is well known in American politics, the electoral pie comprises three roughly equal pieces: the so-called liberal base; the so-called conservative base; and the independents. The left- and right-leaning bases are hardened targets, and as such, virtually no amount of campaigning will succeed in denting their made-up minds. Only the independents are amenable to political bribery.

The liberal base includes a number of well characterized components:
  • the 94% of black voters who would vote for The Obama, even if His opponent was Abraham Lincoln;
  • self-loathing Jews, like Yesam Chumpsky and Rahm "It Up Your Ass" Emanuel;
  • Jews who cling to their parents' feelings of guilt;
  • Jews who believe FDR was their Messiah, which he definitely was NOT;
  • miscellaneous hippies, free-lunchers, nutroots, pink "ladies", and pseudo intellectuals.
Hopefully, Obama will spend an inordinate amount of time, energy and money preaching to this choir of His, though He is street-smart enough not to bother with the conservative base. The latter wouldn't vote for Him, even if His opponent was Daffy Duck.

So, once again, it all depends on the independents. How many will succumb to the snake-oil pitch? How many are so self-involved that they will sell out their own and their children's future for a hamburger now? How many are so uninvolved with current events that they can't imagine the great American enterprise sunk by the ideology of a narcissist?

Time will tell.

Post 1,601 He's back in the saddle again ...

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

The Rightness of Our Position

TEL AVIV, ISRAEL - APRIL 02:  Israel's Prime M...Image by Getty Images via @daylife

Related source » Richard Goldstone and Palestinian Statehood
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]

“Richard Goldstone’s repudiation of the eponymous blood libel he authored last year provides a number of lessons about the nature of the political war against the Jewish state and how we must act if we are to defeat it. Learning these lessons is an urgent task as we approach the next phase of the war to delegitimize us. […] Goldstone’s admission Friday that his report’s central conclusion – that Israel committed war crimes in its campaign against Hamas in Gaza – was wrong is a case study in how we must contend with difficult political challenges if we are to emerge victorious in the political war. The fate of Goldstone and his report hold several vital lessons for our leaders. […] The final lesson of the Goldstone experience is found in the fact that the publication of malicious slander did not paralyze [Israel]. The IDF continued to strike Hamas targets. Fear of more lies from Goldstone and his Israel-bashing associates did not convince the government to stop defending the country. The lesson is that we must not allow the misdeeds of others to deny us our rights. Rather, we must assert them in the face of condemnation and wait until the condemners realize they cannot defeat us. Israel is being challenged by a political war that escalates every day. But we are not powerless in this fight. As we prepare for the Palestinians’ UN gambit, we must keep in mind the lessons from Goldstone. If the government remains faithful to the truth and to our rights, it will empower our supporters throughout the world to rally to our side. If we are good to our friends and bad to our enemies, we will know how to reward our friends and punish our enemies. And if we boldly assert our rights even in the face of international condemnation, we will see that in the fullness of time, the rightness of our position will carry the day.” [emphasis added]
— Caroline Glick, 2011/04/04 (townhall.com)



Supporters of Israel's right to exist and defend itself against numerous enemies should take note of Goldstone's so-called "stunning" reversal. But do not take too much heart from it, for there are two wholly different reasons for being stunned by his reversal. While Israel's friends are stunned that an Israel-basher would make such a public admission of his own mendacity, Israel's enemies are more enraged than stunned that one of their own would betray their consuming hatred. If you read some of the obnoxious comments appended to Caroline Glick's article (excerpted above), you will see that the Jew-hating vermin are roaming the web with their vitriolic spray-cans in hand.

The important lesson to take away from the Goldstone travesty is that such travesties will continue to be perpetrated by the indefatigable Jew-haters of the world. This war has been ongoing for millennia, not just for centuries, let alone generations. It is mind-numbingly ubiquitous. It truly has a life of its own. There are two kinds of people in this world: Jew-haters and everyone else. And I am not sure which group is more populous.

Some people may very well conclude that the fight against Jew-hatred is hopeless. There is every reason to believe that it will never end, unless every last Jew is murdered. But if that is, God forbid, how it does end, I am convinced it will not constitute the end of hatred. It will just be the beginning.

First they came for the Jews ...

Post 1,600 The Rightness of Our Position