This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mis-characterizing these expressed intentions.

Friday, December 31, 2010

"I guarantee you that woman sleeps upside down!"

 “Floridly Psychotic” h/t Secular Apostate 
Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States Hou...Image via Wikipedia

Related source » Dennis Miller - The Big Speech
[This video is recommended in its entirety.]
“Segment from recent HBO comedy special. Miller's take on Islam - Terrorists and Nancy Pelosi.”
— WebsurferguyMN, November 28, 2010

How crazy is Nancy Pelosi? Dennis Miller: "She's bat-shit crazy. I guarantee you that woman sleeps upside down!"




Post 1,528 "I guarantee you that woman sleeps upside down!"
Enhanced by Zemanta

A Plateful of Crazy

U.S. Job Seekers Exceed Openings by Record RatioImage by Renegade98 via Flickr
Read related » The Looming Crisis in the States
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“It is no way to run the nation’s fifth largest state [Illinois], and it is not even clear that investors will agree, but these kinds of shaky deals are likely to become increasingly common as the states try to cope with the greatest fiscal drought since the Great Depression. Starved for revenue and accustomed to decades of overspending, many states have been overwhelmed. They are facing shortfalls of $140 billion next year. Even before the downturn, states jeopardized their futures by accumulating trillions in debt that they swept into some far-off future. But that future is not so distant, and the crushing debt has made recovery far more difficult to achieve. As The Times reported, Illinois, California and several other states are at increasing risk of being the first states to default since the 1930s. The city of Prichard, Ala., has stopped sending out its pension checks, breaking state law and shocking its employees.”
— NYT Editorial, December 25, 2010 (nytimes.com)
If you happen to be a typical free-lunch liberal who takes his marching orders from the New York Times (All the news that comfortably fits!), I have a question for you: Have you had your plateful of crazy this morning? If so, you might be well advised to read your bible's recent opinion piece (excerpted above) as an antidote that, nevertheless, may not be very effective at this late date.

And for those of you who think you are smarter than the average free-luncher (i.e., those who advocate free-lunch for the huddled masses yearning for another plateful) and stash the bulk of your net-worth into tax-free municipal bonds, you might want to re-assess your sanctimonious socio-political mantra, as well as your net-worth and your intelligence quotient.

If the party isn't actually over, consider "last call" having been announced. If you STFU for a minute and listen carefully, you might hear the fat lady clearing her throat.

Post 1,527 A Plateful of Crazy
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 30, 2010

The U.S. Constitution Rules!

Daniel of St. Thomas JeniferImage via Wikipedia
Read related » Two new rules will give Constitution a starring role in GOP-controlled House
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“And then they will require that every new bill contain a statement by the lawmaker who wrote it citing the constitutional authority to enact the proposed legislation. […] The constitutional authority rule will restart this debate with each new bill. Every measure will require a statement from its sponsor outlining where in the Constitution Congress is empowered to enact such legislation. […] "I see this as a statement of the Republican Party, heavily influenced by the tea party, that we are the defenders of the Constitution and we will exercise our constitutional responsibilities seriously in ways the Democrats did not," said Neil Siegel, a law professor at Duke University.”
— By Philip Rucker and Krissah Thompson, December 30, 2010 (washingtonpost.com)
Is this a great country or what? After two centuries of mostly contentious deliberations over sausage-making legislation, the House will finally begin each process with kosher ingredients [i.e., the citing of constitutional authority for the proposed legislation]. I think it's great.

BTW, I think Prof. Neil Siegel (dollars-to-donuts he leans left in class) is correct in what he says. But I fail to see what larger point, if any, he is making.

What better way to begin what will inevitably devolve into ad hominem mudslinging than an a priori claim of constitutional legitimacy for the proposed bill? Seriously, at least the proposal will have a shot at rationality, before the all-out food fight begins.

Who knows, perhaps some of the citations of constitutionality will be so hilarious that the members will engage in a ROTFLMAO-bonding that just might succeed in some bi-partisan legislation. I know it's a long shot, but it could happen.

There is nothing to lose and at least a non-zero probability for gain.

Post 1,526 The U.S. Constitution Rules!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

The Hierarchical Emergence of Evil, Good and Greatness

Jimmy Carter, future United States President, ...Image via Wikipedia
The Boy who Switched
Names with His Dog
Narcissism is the purgatory of evil.”
— TheBigHenry's Handbasket Rule
In the beginning there was self preservation. And the secular god of Darwinian nature saw that it was good, for the alternative was chaos.

From the local reduction of entropy via self preservation emerged self awareness. And the secular god saw that it was good, for the alternative was stagnation.

From self awareness evolved narcissism. And the secular god saw that narcissism would lead to evil, such as Jimmy Carter's Jew-hatred. Fortunately, self awareness itself evolved and adumbrated the awareness of life external to self, AKA empathy.

And empathy evolved into altruistic good, which enabled a fluctuating equilibrium or stalemate between evil/narcissism and good/empathy. And the stalemate between the forces of good and evil led to continual strife and the polarization of opposing socio-political visions, not unlike that which consumes us today.

But, to the everlasting glory of random good fortune, on rare occasion emerges greatness. And greatness, in this context, is the apotheosis of a vision that embraces the greater good at the expense of instinctual narcissism that sometimes masquerades as empathy, such as The Obama's hopey-dopey mantra.

If lady luck once again smiles upon this Nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, then she will once again bless us with a restorer of Constitutional-republican government of the people, by the people and for the right to pursue happiness.

Post 1,525 The Hierarchical Emergence of Evil, Good and Greatness
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Einstein Gravity Could Be Emergent

Simulation based on the equations of general r...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Gravity from Quantum Information
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“It is suggested that classical Einstein gravity [i.e., general relativity] can be derived by using Landauer's principle applied to an information erasure at causal horizons and Jacobson's idea linking the Einstein [field] equation[s] to thermodynamics. Our result implies that gravity has a quantum informational origin.

[...]

In short, the Einstein equations link matter to gravity, and his famous formula E = mc2 links matter to energy. We know also that Landauer’s principle links information to energy. Thus, now we have a relation between information and gravity, the Einstein equations with the quantum informational interpretation. Our theory implies that the Einstein equations [are] more about information than energy or the equation of state. In other words, information might be [a] more profound physical entity than matter or field[s].” [emphasis added]
— Jae-Weon Lee, Hyeong-Chan Kim, Jungjai Lee, 21 Mar 2010, arXiv:1001.5445v2 [hep-th]
When high-energy physics theory (hep-th) is described in terms of Einstein's general relativity, Landauer's principle, information erasure at causal horizons, Jacobson's idea, Einstein's special relativity, entropy, thermodynamics, and, to top it all off, quantum mechanics, you know it's going to be tough sledding through very dense physics. Furthermore, if the paper is submitted to arxiv.org, by non-native English-speakers, with sub-par editing for the manuscript, the sledding gets tougher still.

Nevertheless, there's big; there's not big. This. Could. Be. Big. (I think.)

If follow-on research pans out, this could well be the progress toward the Holy Grail of physics — the theory of everything, which has eluded string theorists for decades.

Stay tuned, so to speak.

Post 1,524 Einstein Gravity Could Be Emergent
Enhanced by Zemanta

"Oh, the weather outside is frightful, ..."

..., but Al Gore's shame is delightful!



h/t Theo

Read related » Mocked U.K. Forecaster Who Predicted Snowy Winter Speaks Out

 h/t Theo


Post 1,523 "Oh, the weather outside is frightful, ..."

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to all my Christian readers.




Shalom aleichem. Peace be upon you.

Post 1,522 Merry Christmas
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 24, 2010

Season's Greetings from America ...

... and to all according to their just deserts.


General Washington Crossing the Delaware on December 25, 1776
(Image via Wikipedia)

Post 1,521 Season's Greetings from America ...
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Neither Fact nor Proof

Noam Chomsky at the World Social Forum in 2003...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » PolitiFiction
True 'lies' about ObamaCare.
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“So the watchdog news outfit called PolitiFact has decided that its "lie of the year" is the phrase "a government takeover of health care." […] PolitiFact's decree is part of a larger journalistic trend that seeks to recast all political debates as matters of lies, misinformation and "facts," rather than differences of world view or principles. PolitiFact wants to define for everyone else what qualifies as a "fact," though in political debates the facts are often legitimately in dispute. […] In fact—if we may use that term without PolitiFact's seal of approval—at the heart of ObamaCare is a vast expansion of federal control over how U.S. health care is financed, and thus delivered. The regulations that PolitiFact waves off are designed to convert insurers into government contractors in the business of fulfilling political demands, with enormous implications for the future of U.S. medicine. […] [I]ts animating conceit is that opinions are what ideologues have, when in reality PolitiFact's curators also have political views and values that influence their judgments about facts and who is right in any debate. […] For a bill that in reality will raise health costs and reduce patient choice, [the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act] recalls Mary McCarthy's famous line about every word being a lie, including "the" and "and".”
— DECEMBER 23, 2010 (wsj.com)
Truth is not assertion, and assertion is not proof.”
— TheBigHenry's Truth Predicate
Although synonyms abound, even a cunning linguist like Yesam Chumpsky understands that individual words have unique meanings. Nevertheless, it is astounding how misused the word "fact" is, especially in political debate.

The vast majority of people engaging in any form of political discourse wouldn't know a "fact" if it fact them in the ass. Yes, you can quote me on that (with attribution).

The most common form of misuse is the ubiquitous conceit that a "fact" can be established by assertion, viz. "I am not an ideologue". Not only is that quote not a fact, it is not even wrong! When asserted by certain spewers of ideology, it is nothing short of preposterous.

And yet, if you peruse a typical post on a blog that invites unmoderated reader comments, you will not be surprised, I would hope, to discover that the majority of comments are replete with assertions masquerading as facts. What purpose does that serve? Even when the readers restrain themselves from ad hominem remarks, in most cases such threads are largely semi-polite flame-wars.

BTW, it goes without saying that my above remarks are merely my opinions, for the fact remains that I am not a hypocrite.

Post 1,520 Neither Fact nor Proof
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

A Nation's Gratitude

September 11, 2001 attacks in New York City: V...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Deal for 9/11 Health Bill Reached in Senate
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“A deal has been reached in the Senate to approve a bill that covers the cost of medical care for rescue workers and others who became sick from breathing in toxic fumes, dust and smoke after the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. […] Should the Senate pass the measure, it will go to the House, where it is expected to be swiftly approved and then sent to President Obama for his signature.”
— By RAYMOND HERNANDEZ, December 22, 2010 (nytimes.com)
The very essence of the greatest nation ever conceived by civilized humans is expressed in the phrase, "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", arguably the most influential phrase in the history of the English language. And though such a spirit was subsequently institutionalized in the American rule of law via the Constitution's Bill of Rights, most everyone is, and absolutely everyone who is a benefactor should be, aware of the steep cost of maintaining the associated rights. As many have observed, freedom is not free. And the cost is not borne by all to the extent that it is by those who serve to protect our freedom at the risk of "the last full measure of devotion".

I have always believed that our Nation's armed forces and first responders, all the men and women who risk their lives in the course of performing their duty, be it voluntary or otherwise, deserve our Nation's gratitude, over and above whatever contractual compensation they earn. Without such people it is inconceivable that our great Nation could long endure.

I believe that a most appropriate form for expressing our Nation's gratitude would be a federal guarantee of the best possible medical assistance to all veterans in need of it. That sort of safety net or umbrella insurance should, in my humble opinion, be guaranteed and paid for by federal funds in accordance with a Constitutional Amendment, if necessary. It is the least we can do to show our National gratitude.

Post 1,519 A Nation's Gratitude
Enhanced by Zemanta

The New and Improved W

"If you hate global warming, get off my p...Image by mar is sea Y via Flickr
Read related » Severe winter weather caused by global warming?
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“As Colorado braces for epic snowfall, Great Britain literally comes to a halt because of record blizzards, and the whole northern hemisphere enters what is predicted to be an especially harsh winter, some climate change experts are blaming the cold spell on global warming.” [emphasis added]
— By Amanda Carey, 12/21/2010 (dailycaller.com)
You read that right — blame it on "warmalism"!

The world of leftist unicorns and climbonmyproctology has a new and improved all-purpose-scapegoat "W" — warmalism. The old and much-abused "W", AKA George W. Bush, has apparently been played out, though now and again The Obama Has need of the go-to guy when He runs short of imaginative alibis. Old alibis and scapegoats never die (ask the Juice); they just temporarily fade from memory until their permanent batteries have been recharged for a fresh batch of useful idiots.

Your winter is getting you down? Don't just insulate your malaise with a down jacket. Blame it on W! Gas prices soaring? Blame it on W. Your mother-in-law is giving you grief? Whip out W. Your girlfriend is a witch? W.

It's cheap. It's easy to remember. It's universally accepted in lieu of cash, facts and logic.

It's better than bacon.

Post 1,518 The New and Improved W
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 20, 2010

Don't go away mad; just go away!

Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Give The People What They Want
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Whether we are analyzing why blue liberalism doesn’t work anymore or trying to think about what kind of political synthesis could replace it, we should do something obvious and ask ourselves what it is that Americans want. We are not thinking through a political program to recommend to one of Plato’s philosopher-kings; we are asking what kind of program and what kind of results could attract the enduring support of the American voters who, in our system, have the last word on how the system is run. […] Americans want to believe that all four of their goals work together: that defending their security, promoting their prosperity, preserving their freedom and equality, and fulfilling their world mission are all part of an integrated package and world view — and that the commonsense reasoning of the average American can understand the way the pieces fit together. They are, in other words, looking for more than a set of unrelated policies that accomplish their goals: they want those policies to proceed from some kind of integrated and accessible world view that meshes with their understanding of traditional American values and concerns. They want an ideology that links the policies of the present day to the national story and the national civic religion.” [emphasis added]
— WALTER RUSSELL MEAD, December 20, 2010 (the-american-interest.com)
Above all else, what Americans don't want is some wannabe philosopher-king promising them hopey-dopey, making nice to our enemies, and shoving smelly-socialist horseshit down our throats. We want leaders who think America is exceptional and has an important role to play in this dangerous world we live in. And the most important role for our leaders is guaranteeing our National defense.

Prof. Mead lays it out in detail, but the verdict is simple and clear — leftist liberalism is way past its expiration date. So say American voters; so says Dr. Mead; and so says Dr. TheBigHenry.

Barack Obama, Joe "BFD" Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Henry Waxman, and all the rest of the leftist liberals infesting our federal government need to retire to a warmer climate. Much warmer.

Post 1,517 Don't go away mad; just go away!
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Art of Negotiation

Read related » N. Korea Says Won't Hit Back Over S. Korean Drills
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“YEONPYEONG ISLAND, South Korea – South Korea's military staged live-fire drills from an island just miles from rival North Korea's shores Monday, despite Pyongyang's threats of catastrophic retaliation for the maneuvers. […], but the North finally said it would hold its own fire.”
— Published December 20, 2010 | Associated Press (foxnews.com)
Read related » The Godfather (Signet) [Paperback] Mario Puzo (Author)
[This related book is recommended in its entirety.]
“The abuse itself bothered him not at all. Hagen had learned the art of negotiation from the Don himself. "Never get angry," the Don had instructed. "Never make a threat. Reason with people." […] An agreement was reached but two months later the strong-arm was shot to death in his favorite barbershop.” [emphasis added]
— The Godfather, Page 57.
The dictatorship of North Korea may be crazy, but it ain't stupid. Is it, however, as smart as Mario Puzo's Godfather? I think not.

The nut jobs in North Korea, as well as their counterparts in Iran, are vicious unpredictable braggarts who make threats on a regular basis that must be carefully considered. Ultimately, however, they weaken their positions vis a vis their adversaries, for failing to heed the Godfather's good counsel, as indeed do many other national "negotiators". They weaken their positions because they forfeit a goodly amount of that very valuable commodity in warfare — the element of surprise. And they do this, presumably, for the sake of winning the much less meaningful pissing contest.

There is one notable exception of a nation that understands the relative values of pissing contests and existential warfare. The leadership never publicly threatens their enemies. They just do what is necessary to survive.

Survival isn't everything. It's the only thing.

Post 1,516 The Art of Negotiation
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, December 19, 2010

It's the intent, stupid!

Picture of Julian Assange during a talk at 26C3Image via Wikipedia
Read related » WikiLeaks Debunks History for Stupid People
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Gideon Rachman at the Financial Times says WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange deserves a medal rather than prison. “He and WikiLeaks have done America a massive favour,” he writes, “by inadvertently debunking decades-old conspiracy theories about its foreign policy.” […] I suspect Rachman’s tongue is firmly planted in cheek when he says Assange should be rewarded. […] Surely somewhere in all these leaked files there’d be references to a war for oil in Iraq if the war was, in fact, about oil. Likewise, if 9/11 was an inside job — or a joint Mossad–al-Qaeda job — there should be at least some suggestive evidence in all those classified documents. […] The State and Defense department bureaucracies are far too vast to have no records of what they’re up to. Conspiracy theories, though, as someone once said, are history for stupid people. […] Julian Assange is stridently anti-American. He is not trying to boost the government’s credibility by leaking thousands of cables.
— MICHAEL J. TOTTEN - 12.19.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)
Whether or not Assange actually performed a service for our government's credibility, based on the widely held view that publicly revealed official policy is largely disinformation, is really besides the point. In American jurisprudence, intent and premeditation play much more decisive roles than outcome. Even conspiracy to commit a crime that failed to materialize is treated with the seriousness it would have been if it had succeeded as intended.

The reason, I can only presume, is that the justice system's primary objective is to deter others from attempting to commit similar crimes, and only secondarily to punish those who have already made such an attempt. A hoped-for better future for all is judged to be a greater public good than the baser desire for vengeance.

Assange clearly wants to harm the United States in leaking criminally begotten classified information. That some or even much of the leaked information has served to advance the objectives of the United States is fortuitous and ultimately irrelevant to the facts of the crimes committed.

Post 1,515 It's the intent, stupid!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, December 18, 2010

A Brief History of American Justice in Knots

Eric H. Holder Jr.Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Eric Holder's Briefs Are In a Bundle
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“The Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives has voted 212-206 to ban the Obama administration from spending any funds to try terrorism suspects in civilian court instead of military commissions. Attorney General Eric Holder is reportedly all miffed and vexed. Holder's knots will tighten if the Senate's continuing funding resolution also includes such a provision. […] Since Congress failed to pass a new budget for 2011, the House passed a continuing resolution […] Somebody on the House Appropriations Committee, to Holder’s supposed shock and dismay, inserted a provision that prohibits federal funds from being used to prosecute terrorist detainees in federal criminal courts […] When Democrat members learned about the trial provision, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer went into damage control mode. […] Holder called it “an unprecedented grab of executive authority by Congress […] We have been unable to identify any parallel … in the history of our nation in which Congress has intervened to prohibit the prosecution of particular persons or crimes,” Holder opined.

It’s about subject matter, venue, and funding of federal courts, Mr. Holder. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to decide on those. You can look it up.” [emphasis added]
— Janet M. LaRue, 2010/12/17 (townhall.com)

The apotheosis of "the pot calling the kettle black" was Eric Holder's outrageous insult of Americans as "essentially a nation of cowards". Along with The Obama's wife, who infamously slandered our Nation, this Attorney General believes it is his appointed role to rally anti-American sentiment, which everyone knows is the purview of the ACLU.

Yes, the ACLU has the dubious distinction of representing every reprehensible perpetrator of anti-American actions and behavior. It is essential, in fact, for the continual confirmation of the righteousness of our justice system that some organization assume such a thankless task. But it was never intended that our Nation's highest-ranking prosecutor perform such a defensive role.

The Attorney General of the United States is the chief proxy for the American People within the justice system of the United States. If Eric Holder can't comprehend what role he plays in The Obama's Administration, is it too much to ask for our Constitutional-Expert-in-Chief to know this?

Perhaps we can get to the bottom of these conundrums at some American airport, through the good offices of airport security. A routine pat-down should confirm the absence of knots in Holder's briefs.

Post 1,514 A Brief History of American Justice in Knots
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Pelosi-lead Congress Galloping to Infamous Finish

Image via "The Gavel Walk" by erik
Read related » Congress' Job Approval Rating Worst in Gallup History
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans' assessment of Congress has hit a new low, with 13% saying they approve of the way Congress is handling its job. The 83% disapproval rating is also the worst Gallup has measured in more than 30 years of tracking congressional job performance.”
— by Jeffrey M. Jones, December 15, 2010 (gallup.com)


Nancy Pelosi has successfully nullified a century of progress for women's rights in America. It is the only success during her tenure as the highest ranking elected female in American history that she, and other self-loathing American women, can be proud of.

Pelosi's strident disregard for a preponderance of reasoned opposition to her demonstrably unreasoned legislative agenda earned her the dubious distinction as the personification of witchiness and its canine homophone. Crass, ass, full of gas, are some common endearments for this vile antithesis to a public servant.

And just as The Obama has proven to be a worst choice scenario for the NAACP and race relations in America, Pelosi has been a terrible choice as the first female Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. She has made the so-called "glass ceiling" more concrete than ever before.

Post 1,513 Pelosi-lead Congress Galloping to Infamous Finish
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

From a Cistern Near You

Conservative Party poster from 1909, in which ...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Where Do Leftists Come From?
The mystery of socialism's origins explained.
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“For a very long time now, I have been turning over this question in my mind: What is it that makes a leftist? Where do leftists come from? How is it possible that sentient human beings, endowed with reason, memory, and foresight by their Creator, or by the evolutionary demiurge, can zealously adopt a political position so contrary to both good sense and common sense — and what is more, remain glued to its premises in the face of all contradictory evidence? For despite the miserable failure of socialist experiments the world over and from time immemorial, the determined leftist does not budge from his ideological sanctum and will invent every conceivable, or rather inconceivable, excuse to validate the soundness of his principles and justify every subsequent social and political miscarriage these principles bring about. […] We live in truly amazing times, vibrant with unexpected discoveries. Such a mutation, if that is what it is, would go a long way to clearing up the once-insoluble mystery of the existence of the liberal-left among us. Some will no doubt find it comforting to learn that we are not alone. Extra-terrestrial life has always been here and SETI can now turn its gaze earthward to examine the galactic specimens we have long wondered about. The shadow biosphere, which in the course of evolutionary time gradually developed into a pervasive and anthropocidal psychosphere, is still a theory. But it accounts for much that continues to puzzle us about the various noxious manifestations of hominid-type behavior.”
— December 14, 2010 - by David Solway (pajamasmedia.com)

Though David Solway engages in some fanciful speculation about the migrations of the perpetually perplexed among us, I suspect their origin is more prosaic. Sadly, leftist are merely the gauche products of unproductive lives.

To add insult to injury, their lack of interest in the vast legacy of human experience leads them to the monotony of continually re-inventing all the unworkable ideas of their antecedents. Moreover, they are generally of the opinion that their inherent "genius" will spring forth effortlessly from their pores without having to invest much sweat from their brows.

They are somehow genetically affiliated with mosquitoes, and like the latter pestilence, all one can do is keep swatting the bloodsuckers away, knowing that a new swarm is undoubtedly festering in a cistern near you.

Post 1,512 From a Cistern Near You
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 13, 2010

The Green Delusion Pollutes the Left

Read related » The Magic Bullet
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“We have lowered the marginal rates on high incomes four times since the inception of the income tax — in the 1920s, the 1960s, the 1980s, and the 2000s. In each case, the result was a much more prosperous national economy, lower unemployment, and higher tax revenues for the government. If you do A (lower marginal rates) four times, and four times, despite differing economic circumstances, B (increased prosperity) happens, a rational person might conclude, at least tentatively, that B is the result of A. Not liberals. As I said, high tax rates on the rich is a religious principle with the left. If the poor have to suffer because of it, so be it.”
— JOHN STEELE GORDON - 12.12.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)
Read related » Why populism isn't popular
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“[Slate's Timothy] Noah's thorough examination of the Great Divergence [widening of the gulf separating the rich from the rest] suffers by eliding the basic distinction between inequality and destitution. The truly destitute are poor in absolute terms, not because their finances, vis-a-vis the affluent, are so meager. If Obama somehow discovered the policy formula to double every family's disposable income during his administration, millions of people's economic anxieties would be greatly alleviated. However, the "problem" of economic inequality would not be mitigated even slightly. The ratios between a New York Times janitor's take-home pay, Noah's and Warren Buffett's would be the same at the end of Obama's presidency as they were at the beginning.”
— November 29, 2010|By William Voegeli (latimes.com)

The green delusion polluting the left is not about carbon footprints or tree-hugging hippies. The green delusion is envy.

The Obama and His ilk who claim to champion the welfare of the poor via redistribution of other people's wealth are doing nothing of the sort, either knowingly or not. They are in fact focusing on Warren Buffet's lawn and envying its finer shade of green.

The delusional aspect stems from ignorance of fundamental economic principals, among which is that wealth creation is not a zero-sum game. If Buffet's lawn is greener than Obama's, it does not follow that Joe the Plumber's lawn is necessarily riddled with crab grass. And if Obama declares that Buffet's grass may not exceed in splendor Obama's smoke, it also doesn't follow that the plumber's grass will miraculously assume the quality of a putting green.
"The key insight of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations is misleadingly simple: if the exchange between two parties is voluntary, it will not take place unless both believe they will benefit from it. Most economic fallacies derive from the neglect of this simple insight, from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another." — Free to Choose, by Milton and Rose Friedman, p.13.
What the do-gooders at the NYT like to think is that their own feelings of envy comprise the moral imperative to act on behalf of the helpless. The so-called "helpless", however, would most likely prefer to have the opportunity to improve their own lot in a thriving economy, without the stifling and meddlesome interference of the elitist "progressive" left.

Post 1,511 The Green Delusion Pollutes the Left
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Like a Big Pizza Pie on the Fourth of July

Michael Moore in 2004Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Now What?
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Remember the Michael Moore shtick in the Cindy Sheehan era? He rose to the heights of liberal society (invited to sit next to Jimmy Carter at the Democratic convention) on the basis of being a useful idiot who could for the more respectable vicariously slander their president. That he had lamented bin Laden had chosen a blue state to murder 3000 Americans, and that he rooted for insurgents in Iraq to defeat Americans (they, not us, were “Minutemen”) did not lessen his utility. We may see him now as a pathetic buffoon, but in 2004 he was an ascendant one, who understood that he had carved out a brilliant career as the unsightly smelly attack dog that nevertheless bloodies the adversary out in the street without the resulting hair and blood soiling the veranda porch.

So the “we are doomed without Obama” hysteria has finally gone the way of the torrential seas, the silent spring, the population bomb, the war on poverty, the geodesic dome, TM, the greening of America, and all the other periodic hysterias of the bored affluent liberal class, whose intellectual factories send in the raw product of challenges and problems and vomit out variously packaged “doom” on the other end of the assembly line.”
— December 12, 2010 - by Victor Davis Hanson (pajamasmedia.com)
Unfortunately, I do “remember the Michael Moore shtick in the Cindy Sheehan era”. That execrable excuse for human detritus wormed his way into the hearts of many people I once counted among my friends and acquaintances, and into the brain remnants of delusional leftists who cling to their drug-addled hippie ways.

Fortunately, there is one saving grace to the Michael Moore pathogen — he is not, I repeat not a Jew. Moore has described his parents as "Irish Catholic Democrats, basic liberal good people".

Had this despicable specimen of human excrement been Juice, the Jew-haters would be oozing out of the leftist woodwork and tripping over themselves to initiate another Kristallnacht to avenge their pathologically-viewed victimization at the hands of "oppressive" Jooos.

Now that Moore has been exposed (I just threw up a little bit in my mouth) for the lying scumbag that he was, is, and will continue to be, we can leisurely await that glorious day when he explodes from mainlining one too many pizzas laden with mushrooms, anchovies, and grapes of wrath.

If we're lucky, it will happen on the Fourth of July:
When the moon hits your eye
Like a big pizza pie,
which explodes in your gut
On the Fourth of July,
That's amore!
[Apologies to Dean Martin]

Post 1,510 Like a Big Pizza Pie on the Fourth of July
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, December 11, 2010

In the pink?

Lithograph of the Assassination of Abraham Lin...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Pretty in Pink? Obama’s Dark Night of the Soul
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Life keeps getting worse for President Obama. […] [T]he mainstream, liberal press and the American left are deserting him now. […] Michael Moore [has] turned on the Messiah. 'Take off your pink tutu!' Moore commanded the President on Bill Maher. […] We and the President were always likely to come to this point. The adulation lavished on a one-term senator of little life experience was not a good thing for anyone. For Obama, it fed an already enlarged self-esteem that had become grotesque by the inauguration. A cruelly accurate piece by Jonathan Last in The Weekly Standard highlights the ghastly series of intentional evocations of Lincoln that a delusionally imprudent White House team put forward in the flush of victory. Important note to all future denizens of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first compare to Abraham Lincoln. […] There’s an epidemic now of repentance from Obama voters. That isn’t me. My eyes were open in the voting booth and I had a pretty good idea of what we were getting when I voted for him. I have always thought he was too liberal for the American people and too inexperienced to know it. I hoped things wouldn’t come to this point, but thought it was likely and still thought he was the best of the two available picks. […] I voted for Obama because the United States needs a government, and that is something that John McCain and the Republicans were simply unable to provide at the time.” [emphasis added]
— WALTER RUSSELL MEAD, November 16, 2010 (the-american-interest.com)

I read Prof. Mead's article (excerpted above) with great interest, and I urge readers to read the entire erudite piece. He is obviously a man of high intellect and gives a very insightful analysis of the phenomenon I have come to refer to in this blog as The Obama.

But, though I agree with most of Mead's commentary, I have a major reservation about his purported reasons for voting to elect Obama, given all the reasons he enumerates why that "was not a good thing for anyone". To wit, he claims that though he was prescient enough to foresee what has now come to pass, he, nevertheless, deemed Obama to be the lesser of two bad choices.

I think it is much easier to admit a mistake than to admit having been foolish enough to make one. Mead's insistence that he knew all along Obama was inadequate to the task smacks of disingenuousness, and misdirection, too. I am willing to believe he sensed it was a mistake, but I sense Mead's reason for such foreboding was not the one he submits for our consideration.

The 800-pound donkey in the room that nobody of note is willing to discuss in today's highly charged socio-political atmosphere is racism. "Reverse" racism, as understood by some. And since I am not anyone of note, I submit the conjecture that The Obama was not only elected but nominated in the first place was an ill-considered instance of affirmative action.

Ask yourself this: If Obama had not been African-American, would you have advocated such an unqualified candidate for the Presidency of the United States? Moreover, what do you suppose is His foremost attribute that accounts for The Obama's formidable personal popularity both at home and abroad?

Post 1,509 In the pink?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 10, 2010

Cuban Missile Crisis Heading South

Read related » Iran Placing Medium-Range Missiles in Venezuela; Can Reach the U.S.
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“According to Die Welt, Venezuela has agreed to allow Iran to establish a military base manned by Iranian missile officers, soldiers of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Venezuelan missile officers. In addition, Iran has given permission for the missiles to be used in case of an "emergency". In return, the agreement states that Venezuela can use these facilities for "national needs" – radically increasing the threat to neighbors like Colombia. The German daily claims that according to the agreement, Iranian Shahab 3 (range 1300-1500 km), Scud-B (285-330 km) and Scud-C (300, 500 and 700 km) will be deployed in the proposed base. It says that Iran also pledged to help Venezuela in rocket technology expertise, including intensive training of officers

Venezuela has also become the country through which Iran intends to bypass UN sanctions. Following a new round of UN sanctions against the Islamic Republic, for example, Russia decided not to sell five battalions of S-300PMU-1 air defence systems to Iran. These weapons, along with a number of other weapons, were part of a deal, signed in 2007, worth $800 million. Now that these weapons cannot be delivered to Iran, Russia is looking for new customers; according to the Russian press agency Novosti[2], it found one: Venezuela.”
— Anna Mahjar-Barducci, December 8, 2010 (hudson-ny.org)

Those of us in our 60s remember the '60s well, except for the drug-addled hippies who can't remember Tuesday. And along with the assassination of John Kennedy, the Cuban missile crisis was the most jarring episode of that tumultuous decade. I remember vividly calling home from Cornell University to say farewell to my parents whom, for the first time in my life, I thought I might never see again.

That crisis, which brought the world closer to the brink of thermonuclear war than ever before or since, fortunately was resolved when President Kennedy and his advisers, notably his own brother Bobby, his Attorney General and closest confidant, won the staring contest with Nikita Khrushchev, who famously "blinked" first.

Today, the United States is being tested not by the Soviet Union but by Iran. Instead of a "Crush Chef" we are confronted by I'madinnerjacket. And instead of Castro in Cuba, we are dealing with Fidel-wannabe Hugo Chavez in Venezuela.

Unfortunately for the United States, as well as the rest of Western Civilization, we are not being lead by a serious President Kennedy with serious Presidential Advisors, including Bobby Kennedy and Secretary of State Dean Rusk, but by The Obama, "aided" by the clownish Joe "BFD" Biden and the silly and pathetic Hillary "Unacceptable Behavior" Clinton.

Fortunately for me, I no longer need be concerned about a farewell to my parents. They are now mercifully beyond any cellphone coverage and television reception.

Post 1,508 Cuban Missile Crisis Heading South
Enhanced by Zemanta

Got rhythm?

Gioacchino RossiniImage via Wikipedia
See related »
[This related material is recommended in its entirety.]
“Hi guys, here's my latest creation! This is a SUPER VADRUM VERSION of the "Barber of Seville" Overture by Gioacchino Rossini!”
— vadrum

Vadrum Meets the Barber of Seville (Drum Video)


Awesome!

Post 1,507 Got rhythm?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, December 9, 2010

There; was that so hard?

Rendering of human brain.Image via Wikipedia
Read related » A Deal Without a Compromise
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“I opposed the original Bush tax cuts. But I support a temporary extension now. Let’s think about the circumstances. We’re in a horrible economic climate. The entire business community thinks the government is out to destroy them. Do we think raising taxes on small business people is going to improve their willingness to invest and take risks? In other words, the economy did fine in the Clinton years with a 39 percent rate. Eventually, we should return to that. But this is not the moment to take another sledgehammer to market psychology. I’m actually a little depressed by Democrats’ inability to think dynamically about this.”
— DAVID BROOKS, December 8, 2010 (nytimes.com)

Was that so hard to comprehend? I don't think so, if the operative word were "comprehend". What I do believe is very hard is to acknowledge that your opponents are right, even if the concept at issue is elementary in nature and easily comprehended by any rational human being.

Divisiveness, especially based on philosophical issues, is not a bad thing. It's the kind of stimulus everyone can benefit from, because it promotes the single most important catalyst for progress -- rational thought. The trick is to keep the dialog rational, which, of course, is redundant. "Irrational dialog" is the oxymoron fueling the conflagration of flame wars that masquerades as our national dialog today.

Not every partisan difference of opinion needs to be engaged while armed to the teeth. If we pause to catch our breath, we can sometimes see our differences of opinion as not much more than a temporary and minor (in the larger scheme of things) perturbation of an ultimate solution.

Let our goal be perfection itself while we strive to approach it pragmatically and incrementally. So much to do; so little time.

Post 1,506 There; was that so hard?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Day by Day®