Note Well:
This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mischaracterizing these expressed intentions.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Useful > Useless > Vile

Related Link » Rep. Pete Stark: ambition vs. a big mouth
“‘McChrystal is one of the best killers in the world, as he proved in Iraq, but I don't think he knows squat about diplomacy,’ Stark says of the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal. ‘I mean, if he didn't have a gun, he'd be useless.’”
— ‘By Faye Fiore, October 26, 2009 (LA Times)’
"Useless"! Indeed. In which case Gen. McChrystal would be the equal of the current Commander-in-Chief, and the superior of the pricks at the microphone, in the picture below.

Rep. Pete Stark, right, would succeed Rep. Charles B. Rangel, at the microphone, if the House Ways and Means Committee goes by seniority (and if Rangel is forced out in an ethics investigation). (SCOTT J. FERRELL / CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY / January 22, 2009)
Post #982 Useful > Useless > Vile

No comments:

Post a Comment