Related Link » Rep. Pete Stark: ambition vs. a big mouth
“‘McChrystal is one of the best killers in the world, as he proved in Iraq, but I don't think he knows squat about diplomacy,’ Stark says of the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal. ‘I mean, if he didn't have a gun, he'd be useless.’”
— ‘By Faye Fiore, October 26, 2009 (LA Times)’
"Useless"! Indeed. In which case Gen. McChrystal would be the equal of the current Commander-in-Chief, and the superior of the pricks at the microphone, in the picture below.
Rep. Pete Stark, right, would succeed Rep. Charles B. Rangel, at the microphone, if the House Ways and Means Committee goes by seniority (and if Rangel is forced out in an ethics investigation). (SCOTT J. FERRELL / CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY / January 22, 2009)
Post #982 Useful > Useless > Vile
No comments:
Post a Comment