Note Well:
This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mischaracterizing these expressed intentions.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Liberals ask ...

Liberals ask, "TheBigHenry, are you against health care for poor defenseless little children?" I respond, "Of course not. No decent American could possibly be against such a thing." Then they ask, "So why are you against Obamacare?"

This line of "reasoning", if you'll pardon my French, is not new. It was a well-established bullshit argument when Grok the Caveman first chiseled it in stone back in 30,000 BC, whence the modern expression, "What the grok is going on here and why the grok is it going on here."

Lets be generous and assume for a moment that it takes roughly 300 pages of densely worded legalese to fully articulate the Federal provision of health care for poor defenseless little children. That would leave roughly 2,400 pages of densely worded legalese for everything else that is specified in what can only be described as a legislative full-term abortion.

There is not a single House Member or Senator, with the possible exception of one Congresswoman whose communication skills can only be described as "incredible", who could possibly have read with comprehension the entire 2,700-page bill before voting on it; never mind that most of its provisions had never been debated in Congress.

I am quite sure that Grok himself would be astonished by what The Obama Himself has "accomplished", if you'll pardon my French.

Post #1,193 Liberals ask ...

No comments:

Post a Comment