Note Well:
This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mischaracterizing these expressed intentions.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Free at last?

AfricanAmericansImage via Wikipedia
Read related » It’s Mutual
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“More and more Americans dislike the president’s policies. […] 'Along ethnic lines, Obama did best among black non-Hispanic respondents, 76 percent of whom rated his job performance positively, 21 percent negatively.' […] (And yeah, I was surprised he’s down to 76 percent approval among African-Americans.)” [emphasis added]
— JENNIFER RUBIN - 09.29.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)

The Obama's approval among African-Americans is 76%, a bit higher than the high regard Jewish-Americans have for Him! Why is this not just surprising, but in fact astounding? Very simple: His approval among African-Americans is no longer monolithic, as it was when 94% of African-Americans voted for Him in 2008. At that time, the latter statistic belied the conventional wisdom in the aftermath of the election that racial bias had been vanquished by The Obama.

Now, perhaps, we are beginning to see the hoped-for promise of virtual elimination of racial bias in America. It was not kept at the point of The Obama's election. Rather, it will be delivered when His approval ratings among African-Americans become less obviously distinguishable from His approval ratings among the general population.


Post 1,432 Free at last?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 27, 2010

Speak loudly about a big stick you claim to have

Theodore Roosevelt and his Big Stick in the Ca...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Cyber attack on Iran expands: Tehran threatens long-term war in reprisal
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Iran admitted Monday, Sept. 27 it was under full-scale cyber terror attack. The official IRNA news agency quoted Hamid Alipour, deputy head of Iran's government Information Technology Company, as saying that the Stuxnet computer worm "is mutating and wreaking further havoc on computerized industrial equipment." […] Revolutionary Guards deputy commander Hossein Salami declared his force had all the defensive structures for fighting a long-term war against "the biggest and most powerful enemies" and was ready to defend the revolution with more advanced weapons than the past. […] DEBKAfile's Iranian and intelligence sources report that these statements are preparing the ground for Tehran to go beyond condemning the states or intelligence bodies alleged to have sponsored the cyber attack on Iranian infrastructure and military industries and retaliate against them militarily. Iran is acting in the role of victim of unprovoked, full-scale, cyber terror aggression.”
— DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 27, 2010 (debka.com)
Speak softly and carry a big stick.”
— U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt’s corollary to the Monroe Doctrine
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”
— Albert Einstein
Sticks and stones may break my bones (but words will never hurt me).”
— A well known adolescent taunt

There is an ultimate-stakes scenario being played-out in plain sight, and it is being played for keeps. Everything else of a contentious nature, which may be concurrently in play, pales in significance. It is absolutely fascinating in a macabre sense, especially with Halloween just around the corner.

The leading-light of darkness for the axis-of-evil has self-identified by its adoption of a "bomb-making bombast" gambit. And supporters of this rogue regime include many of the usual suspects who are rooting for this rogue to wipe out the target they all love to vilify, but which refuses to be f*cked-with at will.

In gamesmanship on any scale, prognosticating winners and losers is what it's all about. But in this particular doomsday-scenario, there are only two possible outcomes: either the good guys win; or everybody loses. And the reason why the axis-of-evil can not win outright, is mutual assured destruction. They either lose; or everybody loses.

So, all the lesser players have an important decision to make. Do they align with the evil ones, or with the ones who are not so easy to f*ck-with anymore. In a full-blown doomsday scenario nobody gets a pass.


Post 1,431 Speak loudly about a big stick you claim to have
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 26, 2010

The Mouth That Roared

Read related » The Victim in Chief
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Friday was a sad day for Western civilization. The day after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad advanced the 9/11 “truther” theory in his speech at the UN, President Obama responded, in an interview with BBC Persia, by calling the remarks “offensive” and “hateful.” He also called them “outrageous” and “disgusting.” […] One’s immediate urge is to tell the president to man up, already. We know what Ahmadinejad said was offensive, hateful, and inexcusable. But what does it really mean for Ahmadinejad or Iran that we’re over here, not excusing him for his outrageous and disgusting statements? Nothing, of course. […] In treating most communication as a means of stating how he feels about what someone else has done, Obama is not merely demonstrating his own personality. He is embodying the character and reflexes cultivated today in academia, the traditional media, and in politics. In exactly his present form, he is the ideal of our cultural elite. Sadly, that elite doesn’t know any longer how to speak to Iranians in the tones of liberty, empirical confidence, and moral courage. Its expertise now lies in reducing all questions to matters of hate speech and victimhood.”
— J. E. DYER - 09.26.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)

In the 1959 film comedy, "The Mouse That Roared", Peter Sellers plays multiple roles in satirizing a then-unthinkable situation in which "an impoverished backward nation declares war on the United States of America, hoping to lose", but wins, despite its own best efforts to the contrary! These days we seem to be living a bizarre tragicomedy, in which we have saddled ourselves with a President whose mouth is the only evident part in His otherwise empty suit. We might as well adopt Beethoven's Piano Sonata No. 8 as our national anthem.

And yet, large parts of our citizenry (44% as of 9-26-2010) support The Obama's job approval. It's pathétique.

I, however, can not for the life of me understand what The Obama is hoping to accomplish, nor what His adoring followers see in Him. To me, He appears as a binocular-rivalry phenomenon, in which only His mouth-that-roars survives. Everything else about Him is an optical occlusion.


Post 1,430 The Mouth That Roared
Enhanced by Zemanta

When I was your age ...

"Directions for Seniors"                      (h/t Theo)

Judging by the spacing between the signs, my guess is you would have to be driving at around 5 mph to read them all. Come to think of it, that sounds about right for the intended audience!

"Seniority" has its privileges, but old age is not for sissies. You take a lot of crap from the young, but you can't catch the little f*ckers to give them the thrashing they so richly deserve.

Have to rely on the grandkids to mete out revenge.

Post 1,429 When I was your age ...

Friday, September 24, 2010

§ I Am Music and I Pick the Songs: Anytime

Elizabeth Taylor, Eddie Fisher, Debbie Reynold...Taylor; Fisher; Reynold; (Image by danperry.com via Flickr)
{Song #76 « Song #77 » Song #78}

§ ≡ One of an ongoing series of posts in which I pick, in my not-so-humble opinion, the best songs of the second millennium. Feel free to offer constructive dissenting opinions; preferably set to music.

Song #77 is Anytime, sung by Eddie Fisher. "Anytime" is a popular song written by Herbert "Happy" Lawson. The song was published in 1921, and is best known from the 1952 recording by Eddie Fisher.

Fisher, the once skinny Jewish kid, grew up on the impoverished streets of Philadelphia to become the "Jewish Sinatra" for his golden voice. He was as famous, if not more so, for his many affairs and marriages with famous (in their own right) Gentile women, though, technically, when he entered Liz Taylor's world, she was already Jewish by injection (Mike Todd).


Eddie Fisher - Anytime



Post 1,428 § I Am Music and I Pick the Songs: Anytime
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, September 23, 2010

More Than One Way to Skin a Dinner Jacket

Human brain.Human brain (Image via Wikipedia)
Read related » Iran is under cyber threat as Obama offers nuclear negotiations
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“The US offer to go back to the negotiating table was made against a background of deliberately leaked revelations by US security sources to US media regarding the recruitment of Israel military and security agencies of cyber raiders with the technical knowhow and mental toughness for operating in difficult and hazardous circumstances, such as assignments for stealing or destroying enemy technology, according to one report. DEBKAfile's sources disclose that Israel has had special elite units carrying out such assignments for some time. Three years ago, for instance, cyber raiders played a role in the destruction of the plutonium reactor North Korea was building at A-Zur in northern Syria.”
— DEBKAfile Exclusive Report September 23, 2010 (debka.com)

Contrary to conventional wisdom, the most powerful weapon known to man is not the thermonuclear bomb. It is, always has been, and always will continue to be, the human brain.

Correspondingly, one of the least powerful weapons is the human mouth, most especially a big mouth. Ordinarily, a big mouth is accommodated by a swelled head, but, as is well known, a swelled head does not imply that a large brain resides within; rather, it implies a huge ego, which crowds-out anything larger than a bird-brain.


Post 1,427 More Than One Way to Skin a Dinner Jacket
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Knowing What Is Right

President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the 1964 Civ...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » The Politics of Resentment
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Few things have captured in microcosm what has gone so painfully wrong, where racial issues are concerned, like the recent election for mayor of Washington, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, under whom the murder rate has gone down and the school children's test scores have gone up, was resoundingly defeated for re-election. […] One key fact tells much of the story: Mayor Fenty received more than 70 percent of the white vote in Washington. His opponent received more than 80 percent of the black vote. Both men are black. But the head of the school system that [Fenty] appointed is Asian and the chief of police is a white woman. More than that, most of the teachers who were fired were black. […] There are many reasons but the trend is ominous. One key factor was the creation, back in the 1960s, of a whole government-supported industry of race hustling. President Lyndon Johnson's "war on poverty"-- a war that we have lost, by the way-- bankrolled all kinds of local "leaders" and organizations with the taxpayers' money, in the name of community "participation" in shaping the policies of government. […] Lyndon Johnson once said that it is not hard to do the right thing. What is hard is knowing what is right. We can give him credit for good intentions, so long as we remember what road is paved with good intentions.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2010/09/21 (townhall.com)

Lyndon Johnson was wise beyond his ken. And I do sincerely believe he meant well. But good intentions, and even knowing intuitively that "knowing what is right" is hard, is not sufficient basis for social engineering policy on a grand scale. Because "knowing what is right" is not just hard; it is beyond knowing, a priori. How do I know this? Because, dear reader, no major attempt at proactive social engineering has ever succeeded since 1787. There are simply too many unknown variables, as well as too many unforeseen and unintended consequences.

The only approach that has ever worked, with spectacular general (albeit not universal) improvements for society, is free market capitalism in a constitutionally-constrained free society. Every attempt at proactive social-engineering legislation leads to an unending cycle of kludge retrofits to fix bugs, close loopholes, and tune the outcomes, which inevitably no one can possibly be satisfied with. The best example is the IRS Tax Code. Another example in the making is Obamacare, which no one will ever know completely despite what that nitwit Nancy Pelosi claims.

The Obama and His like-minded nincompoops are fond of disparaging conservatives as "the party of no". But in the circumstances where both Chambers of Congress and the President are hell-bent for proactive social engineering policy, the best and only rational position the minority party can cling to is "just say no". An alternative comprehensive and proactive social-engineering policy is not, I repeat not, the answer to our problems, whatever those problems are perceived to be. That approach has been repudiated time and time again.

The best approach must be modeled on the most successful legislation in human history — the Constitution of the United States, which has been amended a grand total of 27 times in our Nation's 200-plus years (the First 10 Amendments being cotemporal with the main document itself). All the Amendments were incremental modifications to adjust the great concept itself in some limited detail that was found lacking. None of them were a complete and monstrous overhaul of what had already proven to be conceptually sound.

Post 1,426 Knowing What Is Right
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 20, 2010

The Whirlwind Cometh

“They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind.” — Hosea 8:7
Town Hall Questioner To Obama: 'I'm Exhausted Of Defending You'

No free lunch"No free lunch" theorem (Image via Wikipedia)
The faint odor of buyer's remorse is looming on the horizon, albeit a couple of years late and a few trillion dollars short.

What did you expect, lady? Was He supposed to fill-up your gas tank and pay-down your mortgage for you? Was that what a "chief financial officer of a veterans' service organization" was hoping for? Free lunch?

Embarrassed yet? How many times have you heard people say, "There is no free lunch", eh?

Yes, Virginia, there is a whirlwind to be reaped after the wind has been sown, so to speak. And yes, that's a prophesy you can believe in. You could look it up.


Post 1,425 The Whirlwind Cometh
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 19, 2010

UC Berkeley Spy-Program is an Oxymoron

BERKELEY, CA - SEPTEMBER 24:  UC Berkeley stud...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Read related » American Woman Held in Iran Says She and Fellow Hikers Are Not Spies
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Echoing accounts their families have given in their absence, Shourd said Sunday that the three had been hiking in a popular tourist area -- near a waterfall in Iraq's Kurdistan region -- and had no idea the [Iraq-Iran] border was nearby. "If we were indeed near the Iraq-Iran border, that border was entirely unmarked and indistinguishable," she said. […] Officials in Oman -- an ally of both Iran and the United States -- mediated a $500,000 bail for Shourd that satisfied Iranian authorities and apparently did not violate U.S. economic sanctions against Iran. The source of the bail payment has not been disclosed. Shourd and Bauer had been living together in Damascus, Syria, where Bauer was working as a freelance journalist and Shourd as an English teacher. Fattal, an environmental activist and a fellow graduate of the University of California at Berkeley, came to visit them last July, and the three went hiking.” [emphasis added]
— Published September 19, 2010 | FoxNews.com

Well of course they aren't spies. The three of them graduated from UC Berkeley, for goodness sake. Spies aren't idiots.


Post 1,424 UC Berkeley Spy-Program is an Oxymoron
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Greatest Himself

Read related » A Class War or War?
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“The day before the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, President Obama was asked why there seemed to be a recent uptick in American distress about Islam. “At a time when the country is anxious generally and going through a tough time, then, you know, fears can surface; suspicions, divisions can surface in a society,” he said. “We have to make sure that we don’t start turning on each other.” What is not blamed on George W. Bush is blamed on us all. The Bible-clutching, gun-toting xenophobes Barack Obama referenced during his presidential campaign are now taking out their financial woes on innocent Muslims. Shame on them [i.e., the Bible-clutching, gun-toting xenophobes]. […] The classroom explanation is an insult to public intelligence. So too is the concomitant disclaimer that “the majority of Muslims are peace-loving people.” Not because it is false (it is not), but because no sane person has ever asserted the counterclaim. As a people, this makes us dumber. It makes us dumber to write it and it makes us dumber to read it. It introduces illogic into our reasoning, and once illogic enters, it stays. In public debate, there is always a well-meaning justification for proceeding illogically. […] The enemy is becoming an intimate part of the American landscape and less easily identifiable as a distinctly foreign phenomenon. This is precisely the time for our leaders to find an intelligent way of discussing the true nature of the fight. Officially denying that there are Muslim terrorists among us will not protect innocent Muslims; it will put them at greater risk, as a potentially traumatized citizenry becomes frustrated with leadership that refuses to take seriously the complicated threats arrayed against it. Yet at no time since 9/11 has our government been this willfully inarticulate — even insulting — about the challenges we face.”
— ABE GREENWALD - 09.19.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)
“I am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was.” — Muhammad Ali
“Don't look back. Something might be gaining on you.” — Satchel Paige
People respond to incentives. But the incentives vary among individuals. The key to understanding an individual's behavior and consequently to making educated guesses about his future behavior is "what are his aspirations". Occasionally an individual's aspirations, particularly those of someone who is secretive about his personal background, are counterintuitive.

In most rankings of American Presidents, Abraham Lincoln and George Washington soar above all the others. Intuitively one would think that every President since Lincoln's assassination aspired to third place in the American pantheon. But in the case of The Obama Himself, one would be wrong.

The Obama is a master of marketing optimization. Knowing His mundane attributes for National leadership, He is well aware of the limits on the scope of His splendor in the eyes of the American people, namely "the young, the left and the thoughtless". Slim pickings for The Insatiable One.

In order to meet His unique hunger for universal adulation, He must be admired and worshiped on the world stage. Only then can He exceed Lincoln and Washington, at least quantitatively. Hence, He panders to America's enemies abroad and to the Europeans, which is a distinction without a difference.

So He has embarked on producing fodder for His future memoirs, whose working title is, "How I Wrecked the World's Last Best Hope, with One Hand Tied Behind My Back". This will bring Him unimaginable fame and fortune as the foremost citizen of the world, albeit persona non grata among His long-suffering victims.

Don't look back, Cassius Clay (better known as Muhammad Ali). Something might be gaining on you.


Post 1,423 The Greatest Himself
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Thanks, but I've made other plans

Read related » Yom Kippur
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Yom Kippur, also known as the Day of Atonement, is the holiest day of the year for Jews. Its central themes are atonement and repentance. Jews traditionally observe this holy day with a 25-hour period of fasting and intensive prayer, often spending most of the day in synagogue services. Yom Kippur completes the annual period known in Judaism as the High Holy Days (or sometimes "the Days of Awe"). [...] According to Jewish tradition, God inscribes each person's fate for the coming year into the Book of Life on Rosh Hashanah, and waits until Yom Kippur to "seal" the verdict.”
— From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yom Kippur War 1973 on the Golan heightsImage via Wikipedia
If you are inclined to claim that, "Some of my best friends are Jewish", please refrain from telling those "best friends" to have a happy or a merry holiday. What part of "High Holy Days", "Days of Awe", or "Day of Atonement" suggest "merriment" to you? Atonement is somber religious observance, especially on an empty stomach.

Yom Kippur this year coincides with the weekly sabbath, and also coincides with the 18th day of the month of the secular calendar. The latter coincidence may add significance for those observants who recall that the Hebrew words for "18" and for "life" have the same root.

The vile Jew-haters of the world try to take advantage of Yom Kippur, believing Jews to be most vulnerable to attack on this their holiest day. But the Jew-haters' ignorance leads them to miscalculate, as some of them learned in 1973. Life and self-preservation take precedence over religiosity, even on the Day of Atonement.


Post 1,422 Thanks, but I've made other plans
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 17, 2010

Mutually Assured Ignorance

NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 04:  Residents of the hist...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Read related » The Money of Fools Part IV
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“One of the many words that sound so attractive, to people who do not think beyond the word, is "disarmament." […] In the real world, the question of whether nuclear disarmament is desirable or undesirable is utterly irrelevant because it is simply not possible, except in words-- and we would truly be fools to accept such words at the risk of our lives. […] Why then is President Barack Obama pursuing an international nuclear disarmament agreement? It cannot be because he thinks it will work. Even if he were foolish enough to believe that, virtually anybody in the Pentagon can tell him why it won't. […] His political advisors, however, can tell him how great that can be for him personally -- if he doesn't already know that. It would be "historic" and an "achievement," just like ObamaCare. His political base -- the young, the left and the thoughtless -- would be thrilled and energized. That can translate into money donated to his campaign coffers and people willing to walk the precincts to get out the vote for him in the 2012 elections.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2010/09/17 (townhall.com)

The only thing that has prevented a thermonuclear war (so far) has been the concept of mutual assured destruction. And whence comes such assurance? The nuclear stockpile of the United States. It's that simple. No one can doubt the stockpile's existence and America's willingness to use it in a doomsday scenario.

So, what is The Obama up to with His pursuit of "disarmament"? Why, it's votes for a second term, of course. Why do you think He is willing to gamble with your Nation's security, and by extension, the security of the rest of the world? It's all about the grandiosity of The Obama Himself. Obama may know squat about economics, history, foreign policy, or effective command of our armed forces, but He knows His political base very well.

As Prof. Sowell termed it, Obama's base comprises the young, the left, and the thoughtless — the trifecta of ignorance. Today these are, by and large, the offspring of America's hippies, the original unicorn people. "Make love, not war!" they holler, as their parents did in the '60s, because, you know, "All you need is love. We don't need no stinking weapons, man. When our enemies see how much fun we are having, they will lay down their arms too, and join in the love-making. It could happen."

Well, it's hard to argue against "It could happen", because according to quantum mechanics, the most successful scientific theory, anything could happen. But the probability of most things that The Obama base would like to have happen is vanishingly small — roughly on the order of the probability that pigs will sprout wings on Tuesday.


Post 1,421 Mutually Assured Ignorance
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, September 16, 2010

No Credit from Bankrupt Left

Israel seen through the sight of a gun and sur...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Inclusive Israel Gets No Credit
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Earlier today, I remarked that the left is unmoved by Israel’s protection of the rights of gays and women. It’s not simply that Israel isn’t hanging gays as they do in Iran, or that it doesn’t permit six-year-old girls to be married off; no, it’s a modern, inclusive democracy — a fact that seems to escape its critics’ notice (especially those on the UN Human Rights Council, whose treatment of women and gays is atrocious). Likewise, the media, even in the face of abundant evidence, is slow to credit Israel for human-rights policies and a nondiscriminatory legal system vastly superior to those of its neighbors.”
— JENNIFER RUBIN - 09.16.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)

Credit, shred it. The Left has no credit to give. They have been completely discredited by all standards of ethics, justice, and decency. There is only one venue for winning favor with the leftist "progressives": join their craven Jew-hatred pile-on. That might alleviate whatever feelings of guilt may linger in their midst. The more crowded their rank ranks the more diluted becomes their self-loathing. This is the well known "misery loves company" effect.

Groucho Marx's famous quip about never joining an organization that would have him as a member derives its humor from its irony, though the irony is lost on all self-loathing Jews. That's why people, if you'll pardon the expression, like Bobby Fischer, Yesam Chumpsky, Rahm "It Up Your Ass" Emanuel, and others of that ilk never developed a sense of humor.

The Obama-sponsored road-map for mid-east peace has many detours of misdirection. But its ultimate destination is not in doubt — the gas chambers and the peace of the grateful dead.


Post 1,420 No Credit from Bankrupt Left
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Knowing When to Listen

German-born theoretical physicist Albert Einstein.Big Al (Image via Wikipedia)
Read related » The Money of Fools: Part II
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Words are supposed to convey thoughts, but they can also obliterate thoughts and shut down thinking. […] Even in matters of life and death, too many people accept words instead of thinking, leaving themselves wide open to people who are clever at spinning words. The whole controversy about "health care reform" is a classic example. […] But if we are going to base major government policies on confusions between medical care and health care, or on calling people "rich" and "poor" who are neither, then we have truly accepted words as the money of fools.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2010/09/15 (townhall.com)
“Success comprises work, play, and keeping your mouth shut.” — Albert Einstein
Thomas Sowell is a wise man. When wise men speak, intelligent people listen. When The Obama speaks, He is selling snake oil. You gotta know when to listen and when to run.

Two years ago, the majority of the electorate confused self-promotion with sincerity, rhetorical cadence with eloquence, and reflected smoke-signals with wisdom. Alas, those who retain their clarity of vision in the midst of smoke, mirrors, and storm-clouds of snake oil were in the minority.

If you happen to be among those accused of clinging to your guns and religion (which I do not), or of clinging to your right to vote the bums out (which I most certainly do), then do not take offense, for it is a compliment to your intelligence. If, however, you continue to cling to your hopey-dopey, then there is no hope for you, just more Kool-Aid.


Post 1,419 Knowing When to Listen
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The Fog of Social Justice

WMAP fluctuations of the cosmic microwave back...Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Anisotropy (Image via Wikipedia)
Read related » The Money of Fools
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“Seventeenth century philosopher Thomas Hobbes said that words are wise men's counters, but they are the money of fools. […] Using words as vehicles to try to convey your meaning is very different from taking words so literally that the words use you and confuse you. […] Warm, fuzzy words and phrases have an enormous advantage in politics. None has had such a long run of political success as "social justice." The idea cannot be refuted because it has no specific meaning. Fighting it would be like trying to punch the fog. […] While the term has no defined meaning, it has emotionally powerful connotations. There is a strong sense that it is simply not right -- that it is unjust -- that some people are so much better off than others. […] Some advocates of "social justice" would argue that what is fundamentally unjust is that one person is born into circumstances that make that person's chances in life radically different from the chances that others have -- through no fault of one and through no merit of the others. Maybe the person who wasted educational opportunities and developed self-destructive behavior would have turned out differently if born into a different home or a different community. That would of course be more just. But now we are no longer talking about "social" justice, unless we believe that it is all society's fault that different families and communities have different values and priorities -- and that society can "solve" that "problem." Nor can poverty or poor education explain such differences. There are individuals who were raised by parents who were both poor and poorly educated, but who pushed their children to get the education that the parents themselves never had. Many individuals and groups would not be where they are today without that. All kinds of chance encounters -- with particular people, information or circumstances -- have marked turning points in many individual's lives, whether toward fulfillment or ruin. None of these things is equal or can be made equal. If this is an injustice, it is not a "social" injustice because it is beyond the power of society.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2010/09/14 (townhall.com)

One of the most corrosive aspects of our society is the inexorable self-imposed pressure to eliminate nuance, as if our ever more digitized environment required that everything be reduced to zeros or ones. All gray-matter variety must be eradicated, until only black and white remain. This, of course, would ultimately lead to life without spice and ubiquitous homogeneous boredom.

As the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation informs us, the early universe was extremely homogeneous, with variations in mass density on the order of only 1 part in 105. Were it not for this tiny anisotropy, however, there would not have been galaxies, solar systems, Earth-like worlds, and life itself. Only nothing (i.e., the complete absence of something) is perfectly symmetric, and, thankfully, it doesn't exist in nature, but only as a concept in the mind of man.

The Founding Fathers of the United States understood, intuitively, that all men are created equal to the extent that they are endowed with certain specific unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These are rights that a Constitutionally constrained society can strive to ensure for its citizenry.

But no society can hope to achieve equality of results (despite what The Obama would have you believe), nor would it even be desirable if it were theoretically possible. For it is intuitively obvious that homogeneity of outcomes is as sterile as death itself.

Finally, happiness is the pursuit. You can quote me on that.


Post 1,418 The Fog of Social Justice
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 13, 2010

The Thumbs Have It

President Barack Obama meets with White House ...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Gibbs, Boehner Spar Over Tax Cuts as Congress Prepares for Limited Battle
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“With just 50 days to go until the midterm election, a 9.6 percent unemployment rate and polling favoring Republicans on nearly every measure, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday he wants to broaden the conversation away from President Obama's policies to what Republicans would do if they win back a congressional majority. And in doing so, the administration is aiming point blank at House Minority Leader John Boehner, the man who would be speaker should the November election swing the balance of power away from the Democratic monopoly. "He outlines an economic philosophy that sounds like a lot of what got us into this. The American people want to know who would be in charge of he House, who's leading the Republicans in this election season," Gibbs told NBC's "Today" show. It's a risk to elevate Boehner to the president's stature in the national dialogue, especially since his name recognition doesn't come close to Obama's. But the administration can't seem to help itself as polls show it may have everything to lose if it doesn't find a way to take the spotlight off an economy that just won't jumpstart -- in spite of nearly $1 trillion in new spending and billions more in new proposals on the table.”
— Published September 13, 2010 | FoxNews.com

One of the principal characteristics that distinguishes humanity from most other beings who cogitate (at least some of the time) is the opposable thumb. Thus, small wonder that we have expressions such as "rule of thumb" and "thumb up your ass". The former expression is often used by those who cogitate frequently; the latter applies to those who don't.

Unless you are a glutton for punishment, you tend to shy away from the school-yard taunts that political hacks like Bobby Gibbs specialize in, especially when the desperation hits the fan. If, however, there is an obvious advantage to engaging someone like Gibbs, then a good rule of thumb is to call-out a Gibbs-like a-hole to demonstrate to the public at large where Bobby likes to rest his thumb when he is not sucking on it. But I digress ...

When political desperation hits the fan, what comes flying out is the proverbial brown sandstorm. Moreover, inveterate Kool-Aid drinkers will know enough neither to come in out of the storm, nor to extract their thumbs from their comfy hiding places. These people will vote Democrat, be it a run of the mill miscreant like Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Charley Rangel, and Maxine Waters, or a plain old yellow dog.

So the rule-of-thumb in such situations applies only to non-drinkers of Kool-Aid. And that guiding principle is: the details of House-initiated legislation are far too complex to predict, but, broadly speaking, the revenue bills under a Republican majority will emphasize fiscal restraint, reduction in government spending, tax relief, and market-based job creation and economic growth. All of which legislation will be a very welcome change from the indefensible multi-thousand-page legislation to spend trillions of tax dollars on government-growing programs, for the purpose of handing out so-called "free lunch" to go with the flowing Kool-Aid.

Post 1,417 The Thumbs Have It
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 12, 2010

The Nausea Also Rises

Bush addresses rescue workers at Ground Zero i...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » An Apologetic 9/11?
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“I listened carefully to the president’s commemorative speech and many of the other public statements from our elected officials. This year’s anniversary marked a somewhat new tone, tentative, near apologetic — as if the Ground Zero and Pentagon attacks were wholly tragic rather than solely due to the premeditated murdering of radical Islamic zealots. We’ve come a way from the resolute pact with the departed that resonated from Ground Zero, when George Bush, in his finest moment, put his arm around retired fire-fighter Bob Beckwith, and announced to the world, “ I can hear you, the rest of the world hears you, and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon.” […] [T]he Left is suddenly quiet about the previously supposed constitution shredding — a trope to destroy George Bush, rather than worry about forgetting the Founders. Obama has adopted or expanded all these measures. Iraq is now dubbed by the Vice President as one of the administration’s “greatest achievements” and by the President himself as “a remarkable chapter” in our history. The surge is as appreciated and taken for granted as its reference is taboo. The Move.On.org discounted New York Times ad — “General Betray Us” — never existed. […] A people at war needs to hear at times Churchill’s or Clemenceau’s defiance as much as tolerance. Both are necessary, but if we are continually reminded that Pastor Jones and his supposedly extremist al Qaeda doppelgangers cannot turn us from the path of our accustomed liberality, we equally need to hear that the United States has brought defeat to its enemies, and will continue to do so at home and abroad. […] America needs a Lincoln to give about a 10 minute speech — nothing more — about whom the Muslim world should really fear: perhaps the Russians who destroyed Muslim Chechnya, or the Chinese who curb Islamic expression, or the Arab tyrannies that slay their own, but not the U.S., not us who have welcomed in millions from the Middle East, and saved Muslims from Bosnia to Indonesia. The people have heard enough lectures that “sometimes we have let ourselves down…” Or “sometimes we haven’t always been…” Blah, blah,blah. […] Our president is not connecting with the people on the matters of radical Islamic terror. Yes, we do not wish to be hard on Muslims and yes we are not prejudicial. But at some point, Mr. Obama should think deeply and ask why a Major Hasan murdered his own army comrades, evoking Allah as he butchered innocents. […] Was it really the Jews, or Iraq, or cartoons or something we did? Or rather a warped radical religious ideology that is allowed to spread too often without censure?”
— Victor Davis Hanson, September 11, 2010 (pajamasmedia.com)

There is a recurring TV ad that I enjoy mocking thus: "Are you being audited? Have you not paid taxes for decades? Does the IRS come to your home and office threatening to drill your kneecaps? Are you a stupid f*ck?" More and more I find myself employing such mockery to The Obama's nauseating insistence on misdirection from the intuitively obvious to the obviously absurd.

For over sixty years I have lived as an American, proud to be part of a society living in what is undoubtedly the finest Nation ever conceived and ever dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we have acquired, through what can only be explained as a nation-wide wave of temporary insanity, an obnoxious specimen of leftist elitism as our national spokesman. His every utterance is an insult to our intelligence, our self respect, and our sacred honor. He is an abomination to everything I hold dear.

Never forget what the bastards did on September 11, 2001. Let The Obama apologize for His own perverse vision of America. And don't forget to vote on November 2, 2010.

The Proud Warriors of Baker Company
Part of the Only Marine Infantry Battalion Left in Iraq

Post 1,416 The Nausea Also Rises
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Script for Life

US Navy 021104-N-5152P-001 Sailors exercise on...Image via Wikipedia

TheBigHenry's Two-Step Prescription for Life:

  1. Exercise daily, until your weight [lbs] minus 100 equals your age.
  2. Continue exercising daily.


Post 1,415 Script for Life
Enhanced by Zemanta

… and the horse the bastards rode in on!

9/11 • Remembrance • Vengeance Is Mine                  (pic h/t Theo)
Post 1,414 … and the horse the bastards rode in on!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 10, 2010

Run that by me again?

"At his press conference today, Governor ...Haley Barbour (Image via Wikipedia)
Read related » Barbour and GOP resist counting gains prematurely, as Dems try to energize deflated liberal base
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“But in a semi-darkened Washington D.C. theater Wednesday night, 62-year-old Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour pleaded with a crowd of about 300 conservatives not to get ahead of themselves. “A month is a light year in politics […],” Barbour said.”
— Jon Ward, 09/10/2010 (dailycaller.com)

Sorry, Haley. A month may be lots of things to lots of people in lots of different contexts. But, one thing a "month" is NOT, under any circumstances having physical reality, no matter what your definition of "is" is, is a "light year".

A month is a measure of elapsed time. A light year is a measure of distance, namely the distance light travels in one year (at the speed of light, natch), viz.
1 light year = 9.46 trillion kilometers = (0.3 million kilometers/second)(31.5 million seconds)
Mixing metaphors is almost a sport in politics, but mixing units of measure is always wrong, at least in the physical sciences. Nevertheless, considering that political science is far from being a physical science (some would call it the "deplorable" science), perhaps it's allowed.

Post 1,413 Run that by me again?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Not "like a dog"

Opening for 1985's The Twilight ZoneImage via Wikipedia
Read related » Floyd Patterson, Call Your Office
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“But some claims — like “I’m committed to fiscal responsibility” — belong in a remake of The Twilight Zone. What Obama said is not only untrue; it is the very opposite of the truth. And for the president to warn that “if we don’t get a handle on [the long-term deficit] soon, it can endanger our future” is particularly ludicrous, given that in 20 months, he has done so much to make our fiscal situation worse, […] Obama also has a habit of deriding not just the policies but also the motivations of his opponents. […] It is as if Obama believes his ideas are so transparently brilliant and wise and beyond challenge that only the malicious and malevolent can oppose him. And what is striking is how Obama, under growing political pressure, increasingly feels sorry for himself. “They talk about me like a dog,” the president told a crowd in Wisconsin earlier this week.”
— PETER WEHNER - 09.08.2010 (commentarymagazine.com)

It is rather bizarre that The Obama would claim "they", whoever they are, talk about Him "like a dog", unless He is employing a euphemism for "S.O.B.". I have observed many different characterizations of Him (most of them spectacularly sycophantic) but never as a mere "dog", unless one allows for an interchange of consonants.

But, now that He has raised the issue, perhaps we should reevaluate how He might be perceived in light of His publicly displayed personal mannerisms and inclinations. His many fans, as we know, have been unabashed in heaping praise on His broad-shouldered mantle, which seems a veritable infinite sink for ever more praise. His critics, however, tend to focus on His less than stellar attributes, so as not to risk blindness, which can ensue when gazing directly at the sun itself.

Upon brief consideration of His many spontaneous self-revelations, particularly His bowing and scraping before other potentates, His thin-skinned petulance, and His incessant whining, He has clearly earned that all-American sobriquet, usually attributed to a sissy or a cute kitty.


Post 1,412 Not "like a dog"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Super Duper and Super Saps

Obama Supporter in New York CityImage via Wikipedia
Read related » ‘Like a Dog:’ The Origins of Barack Obama’s Petulance
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“For some reason, Obama believed that those who expected after his campaign promises a real upturn in the economy, or fiscal responsibility, or inspired foreign policy would be satisfied, as they had in the past, merely with soaring rhetoric and superficial reassurance. When they were not, and voiced such displeasure, as ingrates they had supposedly reduced Obama to canine-like status. There is no need to add that abroad an Ahmadinejad, Assad, or Putin does not care a bit for the supposed personal chemistry or ethnic profile of Obama. Whether he was “clean” or not would be an absurdity to both. We sense only that those authoritarian sorts seem so far to like the idea that Obama speaks ambiguously about his country’s past and future, and appears more comfortable in pondering alternatives than making decisions. Given all that, it is understandable both why America is very worried what it has wrought — and why Barack Obama is miffed and lashes out. You would too if both accountability and criticism were novel experiences at 49.”
— Victor Davis Hanson, September 8, 2010 (pajamasmedia.com)
duper (plural dupers): a person who dupes another

sap (plural saps): a fool; someone who is prone to being taken advantage of, or who has been taken advantage of, usually in a situation that is easily perceived by others as foolhardy.

Whatever else may eventually be attributed to The Obama's "legacy", one thing will remain undeniable by fans and critics alike — His preeminence in duping huge numbers of saps during His unparalleled, decades-long journey to the Presidency of the United States. I doubt we will ever see its like in our lifetimes again.

But what of those millions of saps who allowed themselves to be duped by Him and His minions? What of their own personal legacies? I suppose many of them will cling to their security blankets, threaded with equal parts of defiance, denial, debasement, and de doghouse.

And what about those who might possess a conscience and a remnant of self-respect? How do such people manage to sleep at night?

h/t Theo
Post 1,411 Super Duper and Super Saps
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Cut (the Crap) to the Chase

President Barack Obama with House Majority Lea...Image via Wikipedia
Read related » Political Fables
[This related article is recommended in its entirety.]
“The party line that we are likely to be hearing from now until the November elections is that Obama "inherited" the big federal budget deficits and that he has to "clean up the mess" left in the economy by the Republicans. This may convince those who want to be convinced, but it will not stand up under scrutiny. No President of the United States can create either a budget deficit or a budget surplus. All spending bills originate in the House of Representatives and all taxes are voted into law by Congress. Democrats controlled both houses of Congress before Barack Obama became president. The deficit he inherited was created by the Congressional Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, who did absolutely nothing to oppose the runaway spending. […] Another political fable is that the current economic downturn is due to not enough government regulation of the housing and financial markets. But it was precisely the government regulators, under pressure from politicians, who forced banks and other lending institutions to lower their standards for making mortgage loans. These risky loans, and the defaults that followed, were what set off a chain reaction of massive financial losses that brought down the whole economy. […] Most of those who pushed the lowering of mortgage lending standards were Democrats-- notably Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Christopher Dodd, […] When President Bush said in 2004 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be reined in, 76 members of the House of Representatives issued a statement to the contrary. These included Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters and Charles Rangel. If we are going to talk about "the policies that created this mess in the first place," let's at least get the facts straight and the names right.” [emphasis added]
— Thomas Sowell, 2010/09/07 (townhall.com)

Let's cut the crap, shall we?

Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
No President of the United States can create either a budget deficit or a budget surplus.
Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
All spending bills originate in the House of Representatives and all taxes are voted into law by Congress.
Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
Democrats controlled both houses of Congress before Barack Obama became president.
Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
The deficit Obama inherited was created by the Congressional Democrats, including Senator Barack Obama, who did absolutely nothing to oppose the runaway spending.
Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
It was precisely the government regulators, under pressure from politicians, who forced banks and other lending institutions to lower their standards for making mortgage loans. These risky loans, and the defaults that followed, were what set off a chain reaction of massive financial losses that brought down the whole economy. Most of those who pushed the lowering of mortgage lending standards were Democrats -- notably Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Christopher Dodd.
Crap:
Bush did it!
Fact:
When President Bush said in 2004 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be reined in, 76 members of the House of Representatives issued a statement to the contrary. These included Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters and Charles Rangel.

So, let's cut the crap.

Post 1,410 Cut (the Crap) to the Chase
Enhanced by Zemanta