Image via WikipediaDisgusted yet?
Related source » Measuring Force
Our policy in Libya is incoherent. But we shouldn’t be surprised.
[This related source is recommended in its entirety.]
“The most charitable explanation for President Obama’s incoherent policy in Libya — if incoherence can be called a policy — is that he suffers from the longstanding blind spot of the Left when it comes to the use of force. A less charitable and more likely explanation is that Obama is treating the war in Libya as he treats all sorts of other things, as actions designed above all to serve his own political interests and ideological visions. Whether it does even that depends on what the situation is like in Libya when the 2012 elections roll around. […] President Obama started alienating our staunchest allies, Britain and Israel, from his earliest days in office, while cozying up to adversaries such as Russia and China, not to mention the Palestinians, who cheered when they saw the televised collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. He has bypassed the Constitution by appointing power-wielding “czars” who don’t have to be confirmed by the Senate like cabinet members must be, and now he has bypassed Congress by taking military actions based on authorization by the United Nations and the Arab League. Those who expected his election to mark a new “post-racial” era may be the most disappointed. He has appointed people with a track record of promoting race resentment and bias, like Attorney General Eric Holder and Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Disappointing? No. Disgusting? Yes. The only disappointment is with voters who voted their hopes and ignored his realities.”
— THOMAS SOWELL, MARCH 29, 2011 (nationalreview.com)
A narcissist has but one friend. Obama is a narcissist. Obama is not your friend.
What part of "narcissist" don't you understand?
How can anyone remain not disgusted by this guy?
People, this is not brain surgery: Barack Obama — very bad man.
Post 1,595 Incoherence as Policy
No comments:
Post a Comment