Note Well:
This blog is intended for rational audiences. Its contents are the personal opinions of its author. If you quote from this blog, which you
may do with attribution, please assume personal accountability for any consequences of mischaracterizing these expressed intentions.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

$650,000 for Beaver Management

{link » FLOOR STATEMENT BY SENATOR McCAIN ON H.R. 1105, THE OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2009}
[...]
These funding priorities should have the binding force of law, subject only to the President’s veto power. Yet here we are, with a Statement of Managers that totals 1844 pages, including 775 pages identifying over 9,000 members’ earmark requests that are expected to be funded, although most of them are not contained in the bill text. And, because they are conveniently not listed in the bill text, members who question the merits of specific earmarks are unable to offer an amendment to specifically strike them. They are wasteful and they should not be funded, period.

Examples include:
[...]
$650,000 for beaver management in North Carolina and Mississippi

[emphasis added]
Wasteful? Six hundred and fifty kilobucks for beaver management, in two states no less, is preposterous!

Do these people have any idea what women's shoes cost these days?

Post #656 $650,000 for Beaver Management

No comments:

Post a Comment